A M Husain1, G J Horn, M P Jacobson. 1. Department of Medicine (Neurology), Box 3678, 202 Bell Building, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. aatif.husain@duke.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is status epilepticus without obvious tonic-clonic activity. Patients with NCSE have altered mental state. An EEG is needed to confirm the diagnosis, but obtaining an EEG on every patient with altered mental state is not practical. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether clinical features could be used to predict which patients were more likely to be in NCSE and thus in need of an urgent EEG. METHODS: Over a six month period, all patients for whom an urgent EEG was ordered to identify NCSE were enrolled. Neurology residents examined the patients and filled out a questionnaire without knowledge of the EEG results. The patients were divided into two groups, NCSE and non-NCSE, depending on the EEG result. The clinical features were compared between the two groups. The sensitivity and specificity of the features were calculated. RESULTS: 48 patients were enrolled, 12 in NCSE and 36 not in NCSE. Remote risk factors for seizures, severely impaired mental state, and ocular movement abnormalities were seen significantly more often in the NCSE group. The combined sensitivity of remote risk factors for seizures and ocular movement abnormalities was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: There are certain clinical features that are more likely to be present in patients in NCSE compared with other types of encephalopathy. Either remote risk factors for seizures or ocular movement abnormalities were seen in all patients in NCSE. These features may be used to select which patients should have an urgent EEG.
BACKGROUND:Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is status epilepticus without obvious tonic-clonic activity. Patients with NCSE have altered mental state. An EEG is needed to confirm the diagnosis, but obtaining an EEG on every patient with altered mental state is not practical. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether clinical features could be used to predict which patients were more likely to be in NCSE and thus in need of an urgent EEG. METHODS: Over a six month period, all patients for whom an urgent EEG was ordered to identify NCSE were enrolled. Neurology residents examined the patients and filled out a questionnaire without knowledge of the EEG results. The patients were divided into two groups, NCSE and non-NCSE, depending on the EEG result. The clinical features were compared between the two groups. The sensitivity and specificity of the features were calculated. RESULTS: 48 patients were enrolled, 12 in NCSE and 36 not in NCSE. Remote risk factors for seizures, severely impaired mental state, and ocular movement abnormalities were seen significantly more often in the NCSE group. The combined sensitivity of remote risk factors for seizures and ocular movement abnormalities was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: There are certain clinical features that are more likely to be present in patients in NCSE compared with other types of encephalopathy. Either remote risk factors for seizures or ocular movement abnormalities were seen in all patients in NCSE. These features may be used to select which patients should have an urgent EEG.
Authors: Hooman Kamel; John P Betjemann; Babak B Navi; Manu Hegde; Karl Meisel; Vanja C Douglas; S Andrew Josephson Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Ikuko Laccheo; Hasan Sonmezturk; Amar B Bhatt; Luke Tomycz; Yaping Shi; Marianna Ringel; Gina DiCarlo; DeAngelo Harris; John Barwise; Bassel Abou-Khalil; Kevin F Haas Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: John M Schreiber; Tesfaye Zelleke; William D Gaillard; Himanshu Kaulas; Nathan Dean; Jessica L Carpenter Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Johannes Koren; Johannes Herta; Simone Draschtak; Georg Pötzl; Franz Fürbass; Manfred Hartmann; Tilmann Kluge; Andreas Gruber; Christoph Baumgartner Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 3.210