Literature DB >> 12530788

Exposure misclassification and threshold concentrations in time series analyses of air pollution health effects.

M Brauer1, J Brumm, S Vedal, A J Petkau.   

Abstract

Linear, no-threshold relationships are typically reported for time series studies of air pollution and mortality. Since regulatory standards and economic valuations typically assume some threshold level, we evaluated the fundamental question of the impact of exposure misclassification on the persistence of underlying personal-level thresholds when personal data are aggregated to the population level in the assessment of exposure-response relationships. As an example, we measured personal exposures to two particle metrics, PM2.5 and sulfate (SO4(2-)), for a sample of lung disease patients and compared these with exposures estimated from ambient measurements Previous work has shown that ambient:personal correlations for PM2.5 are much lower than for SO4(2-), suggesting that ambient PM2.5 measurements misclassify exposures to PM2.5. We then developed a method by which the measured:estimated exposure relationships for these patients were used to simulate personal exposures for a larger population and then to estimate individual-level mortality risks under different threshold assumptions. These individual risks were combined to obtain the population risk of death, thereby exhibiting the prominence (and the value) of the threshold in the relationship between risk and estimated exposure. Our results indicated that for poorly classified exposures (PM2.5 in this example) population-level thresholds were apparent at lower ambient concentrations than specified common personal thresholds, while for well-classified exposures (e.g., SO4(2-)), the apparent thresholds were similar to these underlying personal thresholds. These results demonstrate that surrogate metrics that are not highly correlated with personal exposures obscure the presence of thresholds in epidemiological studies of larger populations, while exposure indicators that are highly correlated with personal exposures can accurately reflect underlying personal thresholds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12530788     DOI: 10.1111/1539-6924.00282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  10 in total

Review 1.  Incorporating Measurement Error from Modeled Air Pollution Exposures into Epidemiological Analyses.

Authors:  Evangelia Samoli; Barbara K Butland
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-12

Review 2.  Linear low-dose extrapolation for noncancer heath effects is the exception, not the rule.

Authors:  Lorenz R Rhomberg; Julie E Goodman; Lynne T Haber; Michael Dourson; Melvin E Andersen; James E Klaunig; Bette Meek; Paul S Price; Roger O McClellan; Samuel M Cohen
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 3.  Estimating error in using ambient PM2.5 concentrations as proxies for personal exposures: a review.

Authors:  Christy L Avery; Katherine T Mills; Ronald Williams; Kathleen A McGraw; Charles Poole; Richard L Smith; Eric A Whitsel
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Extreme sensitivity and the practical implications of risk assessment thresholds.

Authors:  John Bukowski; Mark Nicolich; R Jeffrey Lewis
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Concentration-response function for ozone and daily mortality: results from five urban and five rural U.K. populations.

Authors:  Richard W Atkinson; Dahai Yu; Ben G Armstrong; Sam Pattenden; Paul Wilkinson; Ruth M Doherty; Mathew R Heal; H Ross Anderson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Air pollution and daily mortality in a city with low levels of pollution.

Authors:  Sverre Vedal; Michael Brauer; Richard White; John Petkau
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Non-Linear Concentration-Response Relationships between Ambient Ozone and Daily Mortality.

Authors:  Sanghyuk Bae; Youn-Hee Lim; Saori Kashima; Takashi Yorifuji; Yasushi Honda; Ho Kim; Yun-Chul Hong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks.

Authors:  David J Briggs
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  Associations of PM₂.₅ constituents and sources with hospital admissions: analysis of four counties in Connecticut and Massachusetts (USA) for persons ≥ 65 years of age.

Authors:  Michelle L Bell; Keita Ebisu; Brian P Leaderer; Janneane F Gent; Hyung Joo Lee; Petros Koutrakis; Yun Wang; Francesca Dominici; Roger D Peng
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  A simulation-based assessment of the ability to detect thresholds in chronic risk concentration-response functions in the presence of exposure measurement error.

Authors:  Garrett Glasgow; Bharat Ramkrishnan; Anne E Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.