Literature DB >> 12530335

The differential effectiveness of psychosocial and biogenetic causal explanations in reducing negative attitudes toward "mental illness".

Ian Walker1, John Read.   

Abstract

Given the apparent failure of the "mental illness is an illness like any other" approach to reducing negative stereotypes of people with mental health problems, the differential effects of biogenetic and psychosocial explanations of psychiatric symptoms were evaluated. Attitude measures were administered to young New Zealand adults before and after a video portraying a young man with psychotic symptoms followed by either biogenetic or psychosocial explanations. Consistent with previous studies, the "medical model" approach significantly increased perceptions of dangerousness and unpredictability. Following the psychosocial explanation there was a slight but statistically insignificant improvement in attitudes. Participants who knew users of psychiatric services, or who had used services themselves, had more positive attitudes than other participants. It is recommended that destigmatization programs minimize efforts to persuade the public that mental health problems are biogenetic illnesses, and focus instead on increasing exposure to users of mental health services. Further research is required to determine whether such exposure should include life histories, so as to highlight the psychosocial causes of mental health problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12530335     DOI: 10.1521/psyc.65.4.313.20238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry        ISSN: 0033-2747            Impact factor:   2.458


  24 in total

1.  Evaluating the impact of direct and indirect contact on the mental health stigma of pharmacy students.

Authors:  Elizabeth Nguyen; Timothy F Chen; Claire L O'Reilly
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Can antistigma campaigns be improved? A test of the impact of biogenetic vs psychosocial causal explanations on implicit and explicit attitudes to schizophrenia.

Authors:  Tania M Lincoln; Elisabeth Arens; Cornelia Berger; Winfried Rief
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  [Stigmatization of patients with schizophrenia: the influence of university courses on the attitudes of prospective psychologists and doctors].

Authors:  E A Arens; C Berger; T M Lincoln
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.214

4.  Genetic counselors' attitudes towards individuals with schizophrenia: desire for social distance and endorsement of stereotypes.

Authors:  Holly Feret; Laura Conway; Jehannine C Austin
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-03-07

5.  Healthy young minds: the effects of a 1-hour classroom workshop on mental illness stigma in high school students.

Authors:  Sally Ke; Joshua Lai; Terri Sun; Michael M H Yang; Jay Ching Chieh Wang; Jehannine Austin
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2014-07-14

6.  Changing Attitudes Towards Voice Hearers: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Caitlin Reddyhough; Vance Locke; Johanna C Badcock; Georgie Paulik
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2020-10-17

7.  Assessing mental disorder causal beliefs: a latent dimension identification.

Authors:  Stefania Mannarini; Marilisa Boffo
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2013-01-06

8.  Psychiatric genetics researchers' views on offering return of results to individual participants.

Authors:  Kristin M Kostick; Cody Brannan; Stacey Pereira; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.568

9.  Putting the person back into psychopathology: an intervention to reduce mental illness stigma in the classroom.

Authors:  Caroline E Mann; Melissa J Himelein
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 10.  Biomedical Explanations of Psychopathology and Their Implications for Attitudes and Beliefs About Mental Disorders.

Authors:  Matthew S Lebowitz; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 18.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.