Treosulfan in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a randomised co-operative multicentre phase III-study.

BACKGROUND: In August 1988 a randomised phase III multicenter trial was started in order to compare cisplatinum/treosulfan (PT) with standard cisplatinum/cyclophosphamide (PC) in advanced ovarian carcinoma, aiming at lower toxicity and maintained efficiency. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred and nineteen patients were enrolled into the protocol. Final evaluation after a median observation time of more than five years was made in July 1996 and included 398 eligible patients, of whom 366 were evaluable regarding efficiency and 290 in respect of toxicity. The tumour stages were classified as FIGO II in 53, FIGO III in 244 and FIGO IV in 68 patients. The patients were stratified regarding post-operative tumour burden.
RESULTS: Hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity WHO > = 3 were comparable between the two study arms though a significant difference could be demonstrated regarding alopecia (PT 8% vs. PC 47% after six cycles). The median time to progression as the main efficiency item was in favour of the study schedule (PT 20.6 vs. PC 15.1 months) while significant differences were neither observed in the whole study group nor in the analysed subgroups (R0, < 2 cm, > = 2 cm). The same held true for overall survival.
CONCLUSION: PT may be recommended as a less toxic substitute for the former standard PC. After the acceptance of paclitaxel/cisplatin as a new standard, the role of treosulfan should be investigated regarding adjuvant therapy in patients without residual tumor, as a potential partner in triple or sequential treatment and in second-line treatment.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes