Literature DB >> 12529879

Cell affinity separations using magnetically stabilized fluidized beds: erythrocyte subpopulation fractionation utilizing a lectin-magnetite support.

David D Putnam1, Vijay Namasivayam, Mark A Burns.   

Abstract

A magnetically stabilized fluidized bed is used to separate erythrocyte subpopulations. Binding specificity was obtained by immobilizing the lectin Helix pomatia Agglutinin (HpA) or Griffonia simplicifolia I (GSI) onto a magnetite-containing support. Separation of type A and type O erythrocytes with the lectin HpA was particularly effective, leading to a 94% purity of retained type A erythrocytes. A 3.1 +/- 0.6 log removal of type A erythrocytes was also accomplished leading to a 99.7% +/- 0.4% purity and 95% +/- 7% yield of type O erythrocytes in the collected effluent. Elution of the purified cells was accomplished using fluidization in the presence of a sugar competing for the lectin-erythrocyte binding site. A mathematical model based on the depth filtration model of Putnam and Burns (Chem Eng Sci 1997;52(1):93-105) was extended to include multicomponent cell adhesion. This filtration model is the first to take into account the finite binding capacity of the chromatographic support and is used to characterize the cell binding behavior and to determine optimal parameters and conditions that lead to high capacities and selectivities. Model parameter values and observations from in situ adsorption studies suggest that the non-spherical shape of the magnetite-based support allows for a more efficient utilization of the support surface area than the spherical shape. Using a 1.5-cm diameter laboratory column and realistic parameter values, the processing rates of the system are predicted to be at least an order of magnitude greater than the 10(8)/h cells that can typically be processed in packed bed cell affinity chromatography (CAC) systems. Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biotechnol Bioeng 81: 650-665, 2003.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12529879     DOI: 10.1002/bit.10511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  7 in total

1.  Computational design optimization for microfluidic magnetophoresis.

Authors:  Brian D Plouffe; Laura H Lewis; Shashi K Murthy
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 2.  Affinity chromatography: A review of trends and developments over the past 50 years.

Authors:  Elliott L Rodriguez; Saumen Poddar; Sazia Iftekhar; Kyungah Suh; Ashley G Woolfork; Susan Ovbude; Allegra Pekarek; Morgan Walters; Shae Lott; David S Hage
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 3.205

3.  Recent Advances in Supramolecular Affinity Separations: Affinity Chromatography and Related Methods.

Authors:  Ashley G Woolfork; Sazia Iftekhar; Susan Ovbude; Kyungah Suh; Sadia Sharmeen; Isaac Kyei; Jacob Jones; David S Hage
Journal:  Adv Chromatogr       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 0.400

4.  Stem Cell Separation Technologies.

Authors:  Beili Zhu; Shashi K Murthy
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Eng       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 5.163

5.  Enrichment of cancer cells using aptamers immobilized on a microfluidic channel.

Authors:  Joseph A Phillips; Ye Xu; Zheng Xia; Z Hugh Fan; Weihong Tan
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Efficient release of immunocaptured cells using coiled-coils in a microfluidic device.

Authors:  Mengen Zhang; Bin Xu; Allison Siehr; Wei Shen
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 7.  Micro- and nanotechnology in cell separation.

Authors:  Milica Radisic; Rohin K Iyer; Shashi K Murthy
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2006
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.