Literature DB >> 12529236

Finger Pairings in Two-Choice Reaction Time Taskscolon: Does the Between-Hands Advantage Reflect Response Preparation?

T. Hasbroucq1, I. Mouret, J. Seal, M. Akamatsu.   

Abstract

Two fractionated RT experiments tested whether the response-preparation or response-implementation hypothesis better accounts for the observation that two-choice reaction time (RT) usually takes longer when the responses are performed by the fingers of the same hand (within-hand repertoire) than by the fingers of the two hands (between-hands repertoire). In Experiment I (n equals 8), the effect of repertoire on the premotor time and the motor time were studied. RT was divided into the two periods with respect to the onset of change in electromyographic (EMG) activity of the flexor digitorum profundus. Type of repertoire affected both time periods. In Experiment 2 (n = 16), the effects of repertoire and foreperiod duration on the premotor and motor times of the flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum sublimis were studied. The results of Experiment I were confirmed, and the effects of repertoire and foreperiod duration were found to be additive on premotor time but interactive on motor time. These findings led to rejection of the response-preparation hypothesis and instead supported the view that the central command for the flexion of the right middle finger differs according to the type of repertoire. The command appears to specify a lower rate of recruitment of the prime movers in the within-hand repertoire than in the between-hands repertoire. The execution of the central commands may depend on the state of excitability of the spinal neurons. Analysis of the EMG signals revealed that speed of contraction of the prime movers depends on repertoire when the foreperiod is long but not when it is short. The additivity of the effects of repertoire and of foreperiod duration on premotor time support the view that regardless of the state of preparation of the subject the pattern of EMG activity required for flexion of the right middle finger in each repertoire is specified during the premotor time.

Year:  1995        PMID: 12529236     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1995.9941715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  4 in total

1.  Information processing during physical exercise: a chronometric and electromyographic study.

Authors:  Karen Davranche; Borís Burle; Michel Audiffren; Thierry Hasbroucq
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Beyond decision! Motor contribution to speed-accuracy trade-off in decision-making.

Authors:  Laure Spieser; Mathieu Servant; Thierry Hasbroucq; Borís Burle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

3.  Perceptual factors contribute to akinesia in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  B Ballanger; R Gil; M Audiffren; M Desmurget
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 4.  Motor Preparation for Action Inhibition: A Review of Single Pulse TMS Studies Using the Go/NoGo Paradigm.

Authors:  Stefania C Ficarella; Lorella Battelli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.