Literature DB >> 12529220

Self-Optimization of Walking in Nondisabled Children and Children With Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy.

S-F. Jeng1, K. G. Holt, L. Fetters, C. Certo.   

Abstract

Children voluntarily adopt a frequency and movement pattern for walking. The force-driven harmonic oscillator (FDHO) model was used in this study for accurate prediction of the preferred walking frequency of nondisabled children and children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Four potential optimality criteria with which the preferred walking pattern was forced to comply were examined: minimization of physiological costs, maximization of mechanical energy conservation, minimization of asymmetry in lower limb movements and minimization of variability of interlimb and intralimb coordination. Age and gender-matched nondisabled children (n = 6) and children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy (n = 6) were tested under six frequency conditions of walking at a constant speed on a treadmill. For the nondisabled children, the results indicated that their preferred walking frequency could be accurately predicted by the FDHO model. They freely adopted a walking pattern that minimized physiological costs, asymmetry, and variability of inter- and intralimb coordination. For the children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy, the prediction of preferred overground walking frequency required that the FDHO model be modified to account for muscle mass and leg length discrepancies between limbs and increased stiffness. Most of the children achieved the same optimality goals as the nondisabled when walking at the preferred frequency. However, the children were found to use different mechanisms to attain these goals: for example, a steeper increase observed in physiological cost at higher frequencies; a lowered center of gravity of the body, which allowed for angular symmetry; and greater variability of between-joint coordination in the nonaffected limb and less variability in the affected limb.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 12529220     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1996.9941729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  8 in total

1.  Dynamic stability of gait cycles as a function of speed and system constraints.

Authors:  Ugo H Buzzi; Beverly D Ulrich
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  Uncontrolled manifold analysis of segmental angle variability during walking: preadolescents with and without Down syndrome.

Authors:  David P Black; Beth A Smith; Jianhua Wu; Beverly D Ulrich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Locomotor-respiratory coupling patterns and oxygen consumption during walking above and below preferred stride frequency.

Authors:  Joseph O'Halloran; Joseph Hamill; William J McDermott; Jebb G Remelius; Richard E A Van Emmerik
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Exploring the Metabolic and Perceptual Correlates of Self-Selected Walking Speed under Constrained and Un-Constrained Conditions.

Authors:  David T Godsiff; Shelly Coe; Charlotte Elsworth-Edelsten; Johnny Collett; Ken Howells; Martyn Morris; Helen Dawes
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Stride-to-stride variability of knee motion in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Michael D Lewek; John Scholz; Katherine S Rudolph; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  The influence of foot position on body dynamics.

Authors:  Maria K Lebiedowska; Todd M Wente; Michelle Dufour
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Lower spinal postural variability during laptop-work in subjects with cervicogenic headache compared to healthy controls.

Authors:  Sarah Mingels; Wim Dankaerts; Ludo van Etten; Liesbeth Bruckers; Marita Granitzer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Spinal postural variability relates to biopsychosocial variables in patients with cervicogenic headache.

Authors:  Sarah Mingels; Wim Dankaerts; Ludo van Etten; Liesbeth Bruckers; Marita Granitzer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.