Literature DB >> 12528844

An ethical template for pharmacy benefits.

Norman Daniels1, J Russell Teagarden, James E Sabin.   

Abstract

We propose an ethical template for pharmacy benefits and a fair process for using it. The template delineates four levels of decisions about pharmacy coverage, connecting ethically acceptable types of rationales for limits with decisions made at each level. It provides a framework for organizing ethically relevant reasons for coverage (or the tiered copayments). The process for using the template assures accountability for the reasonableness of benefit decisions. It requires transparency and relevance of rationales for limit setting and revisability of decisions, including through fair procedures for appeals. The template and the process facilitate broader public learning about fair limit setting.

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12528844     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.1.125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  8 in total

1.  Can quality-adjusted life year avoidance help in oncology drug reimbursement decisions?

Authors:  John E Calfee
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Public views on priority setting for high cost medications in public hospitals in Australia.

Authors:  Gisselle Gallego; Susan J Taylor; Paul McNeill; Jo-anne E Brien
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Principles for evidence-based drug formulary policy.

Authors:  Gregory E Simon; Bruce M Psaty; Jennifer Berg Hrachovec; Marc Mora
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  One of these things is not like the others: the idea of precedence in health technology assessment and coverage decisions.

Authors:  Mita Giacomini
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  6-STEPPPs: A Modular Tool to Facilitate Clinician Participation in Fair Decisions for Funding New Cancer Drugs.

Authors:  George P Browman; Braden Manns; Neil Hagen; Carole R Chambers; Anita Simon; Shane Sinclair
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  An overview of ethical frameworks in public health: can they be supportive in the evaluation of programs to prevent overweight?

Authors:  Marieke ten Have; Inez D de Beaufort; Johan P Mackenbach; Agnes van der Heide
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Health care as a universal right.

Authors:  Rui Nunes; Sofia B Nunes; Guilhermina Rego
Journal:  Z Gesundh Wiss       Date:  2016-08-09

8.  Priority setting in health care: a complementary approach.

Authors:  Rui Nunes; Guilhermina Rego
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2014-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.