Literature DB >> 12528102

Influence of disease-modifying therapy on radiographic outcome in inflammatory polyarthritis at five years: results from a large observational inception study.

M A S Bukhari1, N J Wiles, M Lunt, B J Harrison, D G I Scott, D P M Symmons, A J Silman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of early treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in reducing radiographic progression over a 5-year period in patients with new-onset inflammatory polyarthritis.
METHODS: Three hundred thirty-five consecutive patients with paired radiographs obtained 1 year and 5 years after enrollment in a population-based arthritis register were studied. Logistic regression was used to model differences in baseline factors associated with the start of DMARDs. The time from symptom onset to first use of DMARDs was stratified to represent 4 groups: no DMARD use, <6 months, 6-12 months, and >12 months. Radiographs of the hands and feet were scored using the Larsen method. Progression in the Larsen score was evaluated as a 5-year score adjusted for the first film score. Negative binomial regression was used to compare Larsen score progression for each of the 3 treatment groups with that for patients not receiving DMARDs. Results were then adjusted for severity, based on propensity modeling.
RESULTS: Patients who received treatment had more radiographic progression than did patients who were untreated. Coefficients (95% confidence intervals), expressed as a multiple of the Larsen score in DMARD-treated patients compared with untreated patients, were as follows: 1.6 (1.1-2.3) for <6 months, 2.4 (1.5-3.6) for 6-12 months, and 2.0 (1.4-2.8) for >12 months. As expected, patients receiving treatment had more severe disease at baseline. Using the propensity score as a method of adjusting for disease severity, the influence of treatment on outcome became attenuated as follows: 1.1 (0.8-1.7) for <6 months, 1.6 (1.0-2.6) for 6-12 months, and 1.5 (1.0-2.2) for >12 months. This effect was also seen in the crude Larsen score at year 5.
CONCLUSION: In this observational study, DMARD treatment was a marker not only of worse disease at presentation but also of the radiographic state and radiographic progression at 5 years. After adjustments were made for baseline disease severity, earlier therapy was shown to have a beneficial effect on outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12528102     DOI: 10.1002/art.10727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  53 in total

1.  MRI of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  C G Peterfy
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Sonography and subclinical synovitis.

Authors:  B Bresnihan; D Kane
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 3.  A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods.

Authors:  Til Stürmer; Manisha Joshi; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Kenneth J Rothman; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  EULAR recommendations for the management of early arthritis: report of a task force of the European Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT).

Authors:  B Combe; R Landewe; C Lukas; H D Bolosiu; F Breedveld; M Dougados; P Emery; G Ferraccioli; J M W Hazes; L Klareskog; K Machold; E Martin-Mola; H Nielsen; A Silman; J Smolen; H Yazici
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  [Early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  M Schneider; B Ostendorf; C H Specker
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 6.  Cutaneous nodules in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a case report and review of literatures.

Authors:  Tadashi Nakamura; Syu-ichi Higashi; Kunihiko Tomoda; Michishi Tsukano; Ken-ichi Iyama
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 7.  Anti-citrullinated peptide antibody assays and their role in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Rohit Aggarwal; Katherine Liao; Raj Nair; Sarah Ringold; Karen H Costenbader
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-11-15

8.  Production of functional recombinant cyclic citrullinated peptide monoclonal antibody in transgenic rice cell suspension culture.

Authors:  Do Van Giap; Jae-Wan Jung; Nan-Sun Kim
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  The diagnostic utilities of anti-agalactosyl IgG antibodies, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, and rheumatoid factors in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Hee Jung Ryu; Fujio Takeuchi; Shoji Kuwata; Yoon Jun Kim; Eun Young Lee; Eun Bong Lee; Yeong Wook Song
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.631

10.  Is rheumatoid factor still a superior test for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis?

Authors:  Usha Singh; Anjali Vishwanath; Pramod K Verma; Nand K Singh; Ram C Shukla; Sangeeta Singh; Suman Singh; Gyanendra K Sonkar
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 2.631

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.