Literature DB >> 12527867

[Comparison of contrast resolution between dynamic MRI and dynamic CT in liver scanning].

Akio Ogura1, Akira Miyai, Fumie Maeda, Takaharu Hongoh, Rikiya Kikumoto.   

Abstract

Dynamic studies employing contrast agents have been used in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Some studies have indicated that the detectability of small nodules in liver is significantly better with MRI dynamic study than with CT dynamic study. However, the reasons for this are unclear. In an attempt to clarify this difference, we compared contrast resolution using two contrast phantoms made for MRI and CT. Both phantoms were constructed using the same ratios of dilution of the contrast materials Gd-DTPA and iodine. The signal intensity of different dilution ratios of contrast medium were measured in order to compare the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and contrast. The results showed that the contrast of phantoms in MRI and CT dynamic studies was almost the same except for certain MRI scan techniques. In terms of SNR and CNR, MRI dynamic study was superior to CT dynamic study. In addition, T(1) relaxation of the contrast agent should be considered for suitable scanning, because the contrast of MRI was affected by scan parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12527867     DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.kj00001364261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi        ISSN: 0369-4305


  3 in total

1.  A parametric model of the brain vascular system for estimation of the arterial input function (AIF) at the tissue level.

Authors:  Siamak P Nejad-Davarani; Hassan Bagher-Ebadian; James R Ewing; Douglas C Noll; Tom Mikkelsen; Michael Chopp; Quan Jiang
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Comparing HCC arterial tumour vascularisation on baseline imaging and after lipiodol cTACE: how do estimations of enhancing tumour volumes differ on contrast-enhanced MR and CT?

Authors:  Willie Magnus Luedemann; Dominik Geisel; Bernhard Gebauer; Dirk Schnapauff; Julius Chapiro; Gero Wieners; Ingo Steffen; Johannes Kahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comparative accuracy of magnetic resonance morphometry and sonography in assessment of post-cesarean uterine scar.

Authors:  Gayatri Satpathy; Ishan Kumar; Manjari Matah; Ashish Verma
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.