Literature DB >> 12527318

Suppression of motor evoked potentials in a hand muscle following prolonged painful stimulation.

Peter Svensson1, Timothy S Miles, Darrin McKay, Michael C Ridding.   

Abstract

Earlier investigations have shown that stimulation of peripheral afferent nerves induces prolonged changes in the excitability of the human motor cortex. The present study compared the effect of experimental pain and non-painful conditioning stimulation on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the relaxed first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) muscles. The MEPs were measured in 10 healthy subjects, and stimulus-response curves were generated before and after each of four stimulation paradigms conducted in random order on separate occasions: (a) control; (b) "dual stimulation" consisting of electrical stimulation of the FDI motor point paired with TMS; (c) painful infusion of hypertonic saline in the FDI muscle; and (d) pain combined with dual stimulation. There were no significant changes in FDI MEPs following the control paradigm, and dual stimulation induced an increase in the FDI MEPs only inconsistently. In contrast, the painful stimulation and the combined pain and dual stimulation paradigms were followed by significant suppression of the FDI MEPs at higher stimulus intensities. No changes were observed in the FCU MEPs following the four paradigms. In two additional subjects, the responses evoked in FDI by direct stimulation of the descending corticospinal tracts were significantly depressed following painful stimulation of the FDI, although the ulnar-evoked M-waves remained constant. It is concluded that muscle pain is followed by a period with profound depression of MEPs amplitudes in the resting muscle, but that these changes are at least in part due to a lasting depression of the excitability of the motoneurones in the spinal cord. Hence, painful stimulation differs from non-painful, repetitive stimulation, which facilitates the corticomotor pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12527318     DOI: 10.1016/s1090-3801(02)00050-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pain        ISSN: 1090-3801            Impact factor:   3.931


  29 in total

1.  Brain activity associated with painfully hot stimuli applied to the upper limb: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael J Farrell; Angela R Laird; Gary F Egan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Experimental skin pain and muscle pain induce distinct changes in human trigeminal motoneuronal excitability.

Authors:  A Truini; A Romaniello; P Svensson; F Galeotti; T Graven-Nielsen; K Wang; G Cruccu; L Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Decreased face primary motor cortex (face-M1) excitability induced by noxious stimulation of the rat molar tooth pulp is dependent on the functional integrity of medullary astrocytes.

Authors:  H Pun; L Awamleh; J-C Lee; L Avivi-Arber
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Coexistence of peripheral potentiation and corticospinal inhibition following a conditioning contraction in human first dorsal interosseous muscle.

Authors:  Cameron Blair Smith; Matti Douglas Allen; Charles L Rice
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-09-03

5.  Enhanced corticospinal response to observed pain in pain synesthetes.

Authors:  Bernadette M Fitzgibbon; Peter G Enticott; John L Bradshaw; Melita J Giummarra; Michael Chou; Nellie Georgiou-Karistianis; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Effects of endurance cycling training on neuromuscular fatigue in healthy active men. Part II: Corticospinal excitability and voluntary activation.

Authors:  S J Aboodarda; J Mira; M Floreani; R Jaswal; S J Moon; K Amery; T Rupp; G Y Millet
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  State-of-the-art review: spinal and supraspinal responses to muscle potentiation in humans.

Authors:  Alexander M Zero; Charles L Rice
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Relationship between intensity of quadriceps muscle neuromuscular electrical stimulation and strength recovery after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley; Jaclyn E Balter; Pamela Wolfe; Donald G Eckhoff; Robert S Schwartz; Margaret Schenkman; Wendy M Kohrt
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2012-05-31

9.  Group III and IV muscle afferents differentially affect the motor cortex and motoneurones in humans.

Authors:  P G Martin; N Weerakkody; S C Gandevia; J L Taylor
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response.

Authors:  H Henrik Ehrsson; Katja Wiech; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Raymond J Dolan; Richard E Passingham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.