Jeremy Suggs1, Conrad Wang, Guoan Li. 1. Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital/Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, RN 115, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the effect of varying graft stiffness and initial graft tension on knee kinematics and graft tension after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. DESIGN: A 3D computational knee model was used. BACKGROUND: Many factors influencing the biomechanical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction have been investigated. However, there are no reports on the effect of variations in graft stiffness on knee behavior. METHODS: A 3D computational knee model was used to simulate anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using three different grafts with stiffnesses similar to the anterior cruciate ligament (graft 1), a 10mm bone-patellar tendon-bone graft (graft 2), and a 14 mm bone-patellar tendon-bone graft (graft 3). The initial graft tension was set to 0 or 40 N with the knee at 30 degrees of flexion. A 134 N anterior tibial drawer load and a 400 N quadriceps load were applied to the knee, and kinematics and graft tension were calculated. RESULTS: When fixed with no initial tension, graft 1 was found to under-constrain the knee, while graft 2 slightly over-constrained the knee, and graft 3 over-constrained the knee when compared to the intact knee. When an initial graft tension of 40 N was used, all of the reconstructed knees were more constrained than when an initial tension of 0 N was used. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that graft stiffness has a direct impact on knee biomechanics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. An optimal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can be achieved if the anterior cruciate ligament is replaced by a graft with similar structural stiffness. RELEVANCE: This study showed that if the graft material and fixation sites are selected such that the anterior cruciate ligament structural stiffness is retained, normal knee kinematics can be restored.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the effect of varying graft stiffness and initial graft tension on knee kinematics and graft tension after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. DESIGN: A 3D computational knee model was used. BACKGROUND: Many factors influencing the biomechanical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction have been investigated. However, there are no reports on the effect of variations in graft stiffness on knee behavior. METHODS: A 3D computational knee model was used to simulate anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using three different grafts with stiffnesses similar to the anterior cruciate ligament (graft 1), a 10mm bone-patellar tendon-bone graft (graft 2), and a 14 mm bone-patellar tendon-bone graft (graft 3). The initial graft tension was set to 0 or 40 N with the knee at 30 degrees of flexion. A 134 N anterior tibial drawer load and a 400 N quadriceps load were applied to the knee, and kinematics and graft tension were calculated. RESULTS: When fixed with no initial tension, graft 1 was found to under-constrain the knee, while graft 2 slightly over-constrained the knee, and graft 3 over-constrained the knee when compared to the intact knee. When an initial graft tension of 40 N was used, all of the reconstructed knees were more constrained than when an initial tension of 0 N was used. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that graft stiffness has a direct impact on knee biomechanics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. An optimal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can be achieved if the anterior cruciate ligament is replaced by a graft with similar structural stiffness. RELEVANCE: This study showed that if the graft material and fixation sites are selected such that the anterior cruciate ligament structural stiffness is retained, normal knee kinematics can be restored.
Authors: Musa Zaid; Drew Lansdown; Favian Su; Valentina Pedoia; Lauren Tufts; Sarah Rizzo; Richard B Souza; Xiaojuan Li; C Benjamin Ma Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 3.494