Literature DB >> 12527051

The determination of radiobiologically optimized half-lives for radionuclides used in permanent brachytherapy implants.

Christina I Armpilia1, Roger G Dale, Ian P Coles, Bleddyn Jones, Vassilis Antipas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To use tumor growth kinetics and other biologic parameters in an extended version of the linear-quadratic (LQ) formulation to determine radiobiologically optimized half-lives of radionuclides which might be used in permanent brachytherapy implants. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A version of the LQ model suitable for the analysis of permanent brachytherapy implants has been modified to investigate the radionuclide half-lives that will maximize the biologically effective dose (BED) delivered to tumors with repopulation rates (K values) in the range 0.01-1.1 Gyday(-1). The method assumes that part of the physical dose delivered to the tumor may be radiobiologically wasted because of the repopulation phenomenon, whereas adjacent normal tissues will exhibit little or no wastage. To perform the analysis, it is necessary to stipulate alpha/beta ratios and sublethal damage recovery rates together with the normal tissue tolerance BED. The analysis also takes into account a range of likely relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values.
RESULTS: Rapidly growing tumors require the shortest radionuclide half-lives, but even slow-growing tumors such as prostate adenocarcinomas can be satisfactorily treated with radionuclides possessing half-lives substantially less than that associated with I(125). The likelihood that prostate tumors possess an alpha/beta value which is comparable with, or lower than, that associated with late-responding normal tissues would also mitigate against the use of long-lived radionuclides. Although a number of parameter assumptions are involved, the results suggest that, for a wide range of tumor types, shorter-lived radionuclides are more versatile for achieving reasonable clinical results. The theoretically derived optimum half-lives typically range from around 0-5 days for fast-repopulating tumors (K 1.1 Gyday(-1)) to approximately 14-50 days for slow-growing tumors (K approximately 0.1 Gyday(-1) or less). For prostate implantation, 103Pd is overall a better choice than 125I.
CONCLUSION: With so many variables and parameter uncertainties, it is not appropriate to attempt to define optimum radionuclide half-lives too closely. However, this study suggests that half-lives in the approximate range 4-17 days are likely to be significantly better for a wide range of tumor types for which the radiobiologic characteristics may not be precisely known in advance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12527051     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)04208-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  17 in total

1.  Investigation of 90Y-avidin for prostate cancer brachytherapy: a dosimetric model for a phase I-II clinical study.

Authors:  Francesca Botta; Marta Cremonesi; Mahila E Ferrari; Ernesto Amato; Francesco Guerriero; Andrea Vavassori; Anna Sarnelli; Stefano Severi; Guido Pedroli; Giovanni Paganelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Radiation repair models for clinical application.

Authors:  Roger G Dale
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  AAPM recommendations on dose prescription and reporting methods for permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer: report of Task Group 137.

Authors:  Ravinder Nath; William S Bice; Wayne M Butler; Zhe Chen; Ali S Meigooni; Vrinda Narayana; Mark J Rivard; Yan Yu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The impact of prostate edema on cell survival and tumor control after permanent interstitial brachytherapy for early stage prostate cancers.

Authors:  Zhe Jay Chen; Kenneth Roberts; Roy Decker; Pradip Pathare; Sara Rockwell; Ravinder Nath
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Investigating the dosimetric and tumor control consequences of prostate seed loss and migration.

Authors:  Courtney Knaup; Panayiotis Mavroidis; Carlos Esquivel; Sotirios Stathakis; Gregory Swanson; Dimos Baltas; Nikos Papanikolaou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Brachytherapy for central nervous system tumors.

Authors:  Evan D Bander; Jonathan P S Knisely; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 7.  The evidence base for the use of internal dosimetry in the clinical practice of molecular radiotherapy.

Authors:  Lidia Strigari; Mark Konijnenberg; Carlo Chiesa; Manuel Bardies; Yong Du; Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner; Michael Lassmann; Glenn Flux
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Evolving Strategies to Potentially Further Optimize Surgical Interventions in Brain Cancer.

Authors:  Bindi B Parikh; Elizabeth C Neil
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Novel bioerodable eluting-spacers for radiotherapy applications with in situ dose painting.

Authors:  Francis Boateng; Wilfred Ngwa
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Use of Cesium-131 radioactive seeds in prostate permanent implants.

Authors:  T S Kehwar
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2009-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.