Literature DB >> 12526793

Apical complex genes control mitotic spindle geometry and relative size of daughter cells in Drosophila neuroblast and pI asymmetric divisions.

Yu Cai1, Fengwei Yu, Shuping Lin, William Chia, Xiaohang Yang.   

Abstract

Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric divisions generate two daughters of unequal size and fate. A complex of apically localized molecules mediates basal localization of cell fate determinants and apicobasal orientation of the mitotic spindle, but how daughter cell size is controlled remains unclear. Here we show that mitotic spindle geometry and unequal daughter cell size are controlled by two parallel pathways (Bazooka/DaPKC and Pins/G alpha i) within the apical complex. While the localized activity of either pathway alone is sufficient to mediate the generation of an asymmetric mitotic spindle and unequal size neuroblast daughters, loss of both pathways results in symmetric divisions. In sensory organ precursors, Bazooka/DaPKC and Pins/G alpha i localize to opposite sides of the cortex and function in opposition to generate a symmetric spindle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12526793     DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01170-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  43 in total

1.  From cells on up: Symposium on Cell Biology of Development and Disease.

Authors:  Wallace Marshall
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Cortical domain correction repositions the polarity boundary to match the cytokinesis furrow in C. elegans embryos.

Authors:  Christian Schenk; Henrik Bringmann; Anthony A Hyman; Carrie R Cowan
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 3.  The PAR proteins: fundamental players in animal cell polarization.

Authors:  Bob Goldstein; Ian G Macara
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 4.  Spindle orientation during asymmetric cell division.

Authors:  Karsten H Siller; Chris Q Doe
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 28.824

5.  Symmetric and asymmetric mitotic segregation patterns influence Wolbachia distribution in host somatic tissue.

Authors:  Roger Albertson; Catharina Casper-Lindley; Jian Cao; Uyen Tram; William Sullivan
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 6.  Principles and mechanisms of asymmetric cell division.

Authors:  Bharath Sunchu; Clemens Cabernard
Journal:  Development       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 6.868

7.  Myc and the Tip60 chromatin remodeling complex control neuroblast maintenance and polarity in Drosophila.

Authors:  Katja Rust; Manu D Tiwari; Vivek Kumar Mishra; Ferdi Grawe; Andreas Wodarz
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 8.  G-protein signaling: back to the future.

Authors:  C R McCudden; M D Hains; R J Kimple; D P Siderovski; F S Willard
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 9.  Timing cell-fate determination during asymmetric cell divisions.

Authors:  Weimin Zhong
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  The interphase microtubule aster is a determinant of asymmetric division orientation in Drosophila neuroblasts.

Authors:  Jens Januschke; Cayetano Gonzalez
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.