Literature DB >> 12526746

The "Flash-Lag" effect occurs in audition and cross-modally.

David Alais1, David Burr.   

Abstract

In 1958 MacKay showed that a rigidly moving object becomes visually fragmented when part of it is continuously visible but the rest is illuminated intermittently. For example, the glowing tip of a lit cigarette moving under stroboscopic illumination appeared to move ahead of the intermittently lit body. Latterly rediscovered as "the flash-lag effect" (FLE), this illusion now is typically demonstrated on a computer monitor showing two spots of light, one translating across the screen and another briefly flashed in vertical alignment with it. Despite being physically aligned, the brief flash is seen to lag behind the moving spot. This effect has recently motivated much fruitful research, prompting a variety of potential explanations, including those based on motion extrapolation, differential latency, attention, postdiction, and temporal integration (for review, see ). With no consensus on which theory is most plausible, we have broadened the scope of enquiry to include audition and have found that the FLE is not confined to vision. Whether the auditory motion stimulus is a frequency sweep or a translating sound source, briefly presented auditory stimuli lag behind auditory movement. In addition, when we used spatial motion, we found that the FLE can occur cross-modally. Together, these findings challenge several FLE theories and point to a discrepancy between internal brain timing and external stimulus timing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12526746     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01402-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  18 in total

Review 1.  Minding time in an amodal representational space.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Flash-lag effect: complicating motion extrapolation of the moving reference-stimulus paradoxically augments the effect.

Authors:  Talis Bachmann; Carolina Murd; Endel Põder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-08-05

3.  Dynamic engagement of human motion detectors across space-time coordinates.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The buzz-lag effect.

Authors:  Cristiano Cellini; Lisa Scocchia; Knut Drewing
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Motion Extrapolation in Visual Processing: Lessons from 25 Years of Flash-Lag Debate.

Authors:  Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Beyond motion extrapolation: vestibular contribution to head-rotation-induced flash-lag effects.

Authors:  Xin He; Jianying Bai; Yi Jiang; Tao Zhang; Min Bao
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-01-31

Review 7.  Memory-prediction errors and their consequences in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Michael S Kraus; Richard S E Keefe; Ranga K R Krishnan
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 7.444

8.  Macaque monkeys perceive the flash lag illusion.

Authors:  Manivannan Subramaniyan; Alexander S Ecker; Philipp Berens; Andreas S Tolias
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Do the flash-lag effect and representational momentum involve similar extrapolations?

Authors:  Timothy L Hubbard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-23

10.  Integrated mechanisms of anticipation and rate-of-change computations in cortical circuits.

Authors:  Gabriel D Puccini; Maria V Sanchez-Vives; Albert Compte
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.