Literature DB >> 12524588

Microvascular protection induced by late preconditioning was abolished in STZ-induced acute diabetic rats.

Wei Z Wang1, Seth Jones, Linda L Stepheson, Kayvan T Khiabani, William A Zamboni.   

Abstract

The authors attempted to determine whether ischemic preconditioning (IPC) can provide microvascular protection in skeletal muscle of diabetic rats against injury from a subsequent (24 hr later) prolonged period of ischemia and reperfusion. Male Sprague Dawley rats weighting 80 to 100 g were injected intraperitoneally with either streptozotocin (STZ, 65 mg/kg) or vehicle (sodium citrate, pH 4.5). Rats with a fasting blood glucose level over 300 mg/dl 1 week after injection of STZ were considered acute diabetic. The cremaster muscle of the rats underwent 45 min of IPC and 24 hr later, 4 hr of warm ischemia followed by reperfusion (I/R). Four groups were compared: IPC in normal rats (n=8); sham IPC in normal rats (n=8); IPC in diabetic rats (n=6); and sham IPC in diabetic rats (n=4). Microvascular responses in the cremaster muscle to IPC were determined by measuring the diameter of feeding, terminal arterioles and capillary perfusion using intravital microscopy, and by the evaluation of the endothelium-dependent nitric oxide system in the terminal arterioles. The average diameter of the feeding and terminal arterioles, as well as capillary perfusion, were significantly decreased in diabetic animals, compared to normal animals. There was a significant endothelial dysfunction detected in the terminal arterioles of diabetic rats. Ischemic preconditioning provided significant microvascular protection against prolonged ischemia/reperfusion in normal rats, but not in diabetic rats. IPC-induced microvascular protection in the normal skeletal muscle was abolished in STZ-induced acute diabetic rats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12524588     DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-36501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  5 in total

Review 1.  Preconditioning provides neuroprotection in models of CNS disease: paradigms and clinical significance.

Authors:  R Anne Stetler; Rehana K Leak; Yu Gan; Peiying Li; Feng Zhang; Xiaoming Hu; Zheng Jing; Jun Chen; Michael J Zigmond; Yanqin Gao
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 2.  The coronary circulation in acute myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury: a target for cardioprotection.

Authors:  Derek J Hausenloy; William Chilian; Filippo Crea; Sean M Davidson; Peter Ferdinandy; David Garcia-Dorado; Niels van Royen; Rainer Schulz; Gerd Heusch
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 10.787

3.  Is there a place for cerebral preconditioning in the clinic?

Authors:  Richard F Keep; Michael M Wang; Jianming Xiang; Ya Hua; Guohua Xi
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 4.  Investigation of reperfusion injury and ischemic preconditioning in microsurgery.

Authors:  Wei Zhong Wang
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.425

Review 5.  Hyperbaric oxygen preconditioning: a reliable option for neuroprotection.

Authors:  Qin Hu; Anatol Manaenko; Nathanael Matei; Zhenni Guo; Ting Xu; Jiping Tang; John H Zhang
Journal:  Med Gas Res       Date:  2016-04-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.