Literature DB >> 12523611

Nasal bone evaluation in fetuses with Down syndrome during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.

Wesley Lee1, Greggory R DeVore, Christine H Comstock, Karim D Kalache, Beverley McNie, Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa, Giancarlo Conoscenti, Marjorie C Treadwell, Anthony Johnson, Raywin Huang, Roberto Romero.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the use of three-dimensional ultrasonography for evaluating the fetal nasal bone, as a sonographic marker of Down syndrome, during the second and early third trimesters of pregnancy.
METHODS: Forty fetuses, including 20 with trisomy 21, were scanned once by three-dimensional ultrasonography. A midline sagittal view of the facial profile was used to analyze the volume data. Independent examiners reviewed blinded and randomly allocated volume data sets for the nasal bone. Interobserver reliability was evaluated for the sonographic presence or absence of the nasal bone. Logistic regression determined the contribution of this parameter to the presence of Down syndrome.
RESULTS: Both examiners showed substantial agreement in scoring whether the nasal bone was visualized by three-dimensional ultrasonography (P < .001). They identified 40% to 45% of fetuses with abnormalities using the absence of the nasal bone as a sonographic marker. However, a substantial number of fetuses with abnormalities were also found to have a nasal bone present. The nasal bone was visualized in 80% to 90% of fetuses without abnormalities.
CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional ultrasonography can be used to evaluate the fetal nasal bone with substantial interobserver agreement during the second and early third trimesters of pregnancy. A nonvisualized nasal bone identified 40% to 45% of fetuses with Down syndrome in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12523611     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2003.22.1.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  3 in total

Review 1.  Three- and 4-dimensional ultrasound in obstetric practice: does it help?

Authors:  Luís F Gonçalves; Wesley Lee; Jimmy Espinoza; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Ultrasound diagnostic schema for the determination of increased risk for chromosomal fetal aneuploidies in the first half of pregnancy.

Authors:  Piotr Sieroszewski; Małgorzata Perenc; Elzbieta Baś-Budecka; Jacek Suzin
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Adjusted classification for ultrasound scoring index for antenatal detection of fetal trisomy.

Authors:  Viroj Wiwanitkit
Journal:  Indian J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.