Literature DB >> 12523596

Outcome of necrosectomy in acute pancreatitis: the case for continued vigilance.

G C Beattie1, J Mason, D Swan, K K Madhavan, A K Siriwardena.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgery for pancreatic necrosis complicating acute severe pancreatitis carries a high risk of mortality and may be influenced by a range of variables including patterns of referral, case selection and quality of care.
METHODS: An observational study of a consecutive series of 54 patients undergoing pancreatic necrosectomy in a specialist Hepatobiliary unit over an 8-year study period. Principal outcomes were organ dysfunction and physiological derangement in relation to surgery, microbial colonization of necrosis and relation to outcome, re-operation rates, requirement for peri-operative nutritional support, trends in mortality and survival analysis.
RESULTS: Necrosectomy was associated with statistically significant deterioration in immediate postoperative organ dysfunction scores (ANOVA P < 0.01). Infected necrosis was present in 36 (68%). Fungal colonization of necrosis was present in 5 (9%). Mortality in this subgroup was 80% (4 deaths). There was no association between bacterial colonization of necrosis and death in this study (P = 0.77; Fisher exact test; relative risk 0.9,95% confidence interval 0.54-1.54). Twenty patients (37%) required further surgical intervention with an average of 1.5 surgical procedures per patient. Twenty-three patients (43%) died. Patient survival to discharge was best predicted by admission APACHE-II score with relative risk of death increasing 14% for each unit increase in APACHE-II score at admission.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study illustrate that there is no place for complacency in the surgical management of patients with severe acute pancreatitis. A clinical governance approach would promote pre-defined protocols between admitting hospitals and tertiary referral centres. Future research should target new interventions in patients with high admission APACHE-II scores in whom prognosis is particularly poor and explore the role of infection of necrotic tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12523596     DOI: 10.1080/003655202762671341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  13 in total

Review 1.  Surgery for pancreatic necrosis: "whom, when and what".

Authors:  S Connor; J P Neoptolemos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Gastroenterology services in the UK. The burden of disease, and the organisation and delivery of services for gastrointestinal and liver disorders: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  J G Williams; S E Roberts; M F Ali; W Y Cheung; D R Cohen; G Demery; A Edwards; M Greer; M D Hellier; H A Hutchings; B Ip; M F Longo; I T Russell; H A Snooks; J C Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Combined anterior and posterior open treatment in infected pancreatic necrosis.

Authors:  Daniele Gui; Fabio Pacelli; Massimo Di Mugno; Matteo Runfola; Sabina Magalini; Federico Famiglietti; Giovanni B Doglietto
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Open transgastric debridement and internal drainage of symptomatic non-infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis.

Authors:  Gitonga Munene; Elijah Dixon; Francis Sutherland
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Current status of minimally invasive necrosectomy for post-inflammatory pancreatic necrosis.

Authors:  Benoy Idicula Babu; Ajith Kumar Siriwardena
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Trends in fungal colonization of pancreatic necrosis in patients undergoing necrosectomy for acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  N K K King; H P P Siriwardana; B Wood; A K Siriwardena
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 7.  Acute pancreatitis: risk of recurrence and late consequences of the disease.

Authors:  Juhani Sand; Isto Nordback
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 46.802

8.  Drotrecogin alfa (recombinant human activated protein C) in severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Saurabh Jamdar; Ajith K Siriwardena
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Pro/con debate: antifungal prophylaxis is important to prevent fungal infection in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Authors:  Philippe Eggimann; Saurabh Jamdar; Ajith K Siriwardena
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Prognostic factors in patients undergoing surgery for severe necrotizing pancreatitis.

Authors:  R Mofidi; A C Lee; K K Madhavan; O J Garden; R W Parks
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.