Literature DB >> 12523516

The three screen doors: can marine "protected" areas be effective?

Stephen C Jameson1, Mark H Tupper, Jonathon M Ridley.   

Abstract

The great majority of marine protected areas (MPAs) fail to meet their management objectives. So MPAs can be effective conservation tools, we recommend two paradigm shifts, the first related to how they are located and the second related to how they are managed. MPAs are unlikely to be effective if they are located in areas that are subject to numerous, and often uncontrollable, external stressors from atmospheric, terrestrial, and oceanic sources, all of which can degrade the environment and compromise protection. MPA effectiveness is also limited by low institutional and community capacity for management and inappropriate size with respect to ecological needs. In particular, the check list approach to management does not ensure that key threats are dealt with, or that management expenditures provide a quantifiable return. We recommend a business planning approach to MPA management, in which managers focus on the viability of the management system, i.e., the ability of the MPA to provide ecological goods and services to its target users over the long term.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12523516     DOI: 10.1016/s0025-326x(02)00258-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  27 in total

1.  Coral decline threatens fish biodiversity in marine reserves.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Jones; Mark I McCormick; Maya Srinivasan; Janelle V Eagle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A framework of lessons learned from community-based marine reserves and its effectiveness in guiding a new coastal management initiative in the Philippines.

Authors:  Maria Beger; Alastair R Harborne; Terence P Dacles; Jean-Luc Solandt; Gerardo L Ledesma
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  In vitro cell-toxicity screening as an alternative animal model for coral toxicology: effects of heat stress, sulfide, rotenone, cyanide, and cuprous oxide on cell viability and mitochondrial function.

Authors:  Craig A Downs; John E Fauth; Virgil D Downs; Gary K Ostrander
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  A fuzzy logic approach to marine spatial management.

Authors:  Lydia C L Teh; Louise S L Teh
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Global marine protection targets: how S.M.A.R.T are they?

Authors:  Louisa Wood
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  A global evaluation of coral reef management performance: are MPAs producing conservation and socio-economic improvements?

Authors:  Venetia Hargreaves-Allen; Susana Mourato; Eleanor Jane Milner-Gulland
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Tracking the debate around marine protected areas: key issues and the BEG framework.

Authors:  Andy Thorpe; Maarten Bavinck; Sarah Coulthard
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  A global analysis of the effectiveness of marine protected areas in preventing coral loss.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Selig; John F Bruno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A survey of environmental pollutants and cellular-stress markers of Porites astreoides at six sites in St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands.

Authors:  Craig A Downs; Cheryl M Woodley; John E Fauth; Sean Knutson; Martina Maria Burtscher; Lisa A May; Athena R Avadanei; Julie L Higgins; Gary K Ostrander
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  Effectiveness of marine protected areas in managing the drivers of ecosystem change: a case of Mnazi Bay Marine Park, Tanzania.

Authors:  Milali Ernest Machumu; Amararatne Yakupitiyage
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 5.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.