Literature DB >> 12521729

The variation in urodynamic practice in the United Kingdom.

O A Adekanmi1, G J Edwards, J W Barrington.   

Abstract

The object of this study was to determine the variation in urodynamic practices in the United Kingdom. One hundred questionnaires were sent to units known to be performing urodynamic investigations. It was obvious that there was a significant variation in practices with only 51% of units having a protocol for what tests should be performed, under what circumstances and how. Standardisation of urodynamic variables may result in a greater consistency of diagnosis, allowing easier comparisons of treatment regimes and outcomes.

Mesh：

Year:  2002        PMID： 12521729     DOI： 10.1080/01443610120101727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN： 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  8 in total

1.  Pelvic floor muscle function in women with pelvic floor dysfunction: a retrospective chart review, 1992-2008.

Authors:  Sigrid Tibaek; Christian Dehlendorff
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Assessing professional equipoise and views about a future clinical trial of invasive urodynamics prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a survey within a mixed methods feasibility study.

Authors:  Paul Hilton; Andy Bryant; Denise Howel; Elaine McColl; Brian S Buckley; Malcolm Lucas; Douglas G Tincello; Natalie Armstrong
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.696

3.  INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invasive urodynamic testing.

Authors:  Megan Murdoch; Elaine McColl; Denise Howel; Mark Deverill; Brian S Buckley; Malcolm Lucas; Christopher R Chapple; Douglas G Tincello; Natalie Armstrong; Cath Brennand; Jing Shen; Luke Vale; Paul Hilton
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  A mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing versus clinical assessment and non-invasive tests prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: the INVESTIGATE-I study.

Authors:  Paul Hilton; Natalie Armstrong; Catherine Brennand; Denise Howel; Jing Shen; Andrew Bryant; Douglas G Tincello; Malcolm G Lucas; Brian S Buckley; Christopher R Chapple; Tara Homer; Luke Vale; Elaine McColl
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Can primary care nurse administered pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) be implemented for the prevention and treatment of urinary incontinence? A study protocol.

Authors:  Sue Child; Alice Bateman; Joanna Shuttleworth; Christian Gericke; Robert Freeman
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2013-02-13

6.  Recommendations for conducting invasive urodynamics for men with lower urinary tract symptoms: Qualitative interview findings from a large randomized controlled trial (UPSTREAM).

Authors:  Lucy E Selman; Cynthia A Ochieng; Amanda L Lewis; Marcus J Drake; Jeremy Horwood
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.696

7.  Trial participation as avoidance strategy: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Natalie Armstrong; Elizabeth Shaw; Elaine McColl; Douglas G Tincello; Paul Hilton
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Invasive urodynamic testing prior to surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence in women: cost-effectiveness and value of information analyses in the context of a mixed methods feasibility study.

Authors:  Tara Homer; Jing Shen; Luke Vale; Elaine McColl; Douglas G Tincello; Paul Hilton
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2018-03-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.