Literature DB >> 12520580

The National Health Service Breast Screening Programme and British Association of Surgical Oncology audit of quality assurance in breast screening 1996-2001.

P Sauven1, H Bishop, J Patnick, J Walton, E Wheeler, G Lawrence.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) is an example of a nationally coordinated quality assurance programme in which all the professional groups involved participate.
METHODS: Surgeons, radiologists and pathologists defined the clinical outcome measures against which they would subsequently be audited. The NHSBSP and the Association of Breast Surgery at BASO are jointly responsible for coordinating an annual audit of all surgical activities undertaken within the NHSBSP.
RESULTS: The trends for key outcome measures between 1996 and 2001 are provided. The preoperative diagnosis rate (minimum standard 70 per cent or more) improved from 63 to 87 per cent. This rise was mirrored by an increase in the use of core biopsy in preference to fine-needle cytology. The proportion of patients in whom lymph node status was recorded improved from 81 to 93 per cent. There was no significant change in the number of women treated by low case-load surgeons and waiting times for surgery increased through the study interval.
CONCLUSION: The BASO-NHSBSP Breast Audit has recorded major changes in clinical practice over 5 years. A key feature has been the dissemination of good practice through feedback of the results at local and national level. Copyright 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12520580     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  8 in total

1.  Maximising benefit and minimising harm of screening.

Authors:  J A M Gray; J Patnick; R G Blanks
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-03-01

2.  Earlier diagnosis of breast cancer outside of a screening programme.

Authors:  Chris I Flowers
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  The evolution of cancer surgery and future perspectives.

Authors:  Lynda Wyld; Riccardo A Audisio; Graeme J Poston
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Precision biopsy of breast microcalcifications: An improvement in surgical excision.

Authors:  You Peng; Zhong-Yao Luo; Jie Ni; Hai-Dong Cui; Bei Lu; Ai-Zhai Xiang; Jun Zhou; Jin-Wang Ding; Wen-Hui Chen; Jing Zhao; Jian-Hua Fang; Pan Zhao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 5.  Use of Diagnostic Imaging Modalities in Modern Screening, Diagnostics and Management of Breast Tumours 1st Central-Eastern European Professional Consensus Statement on Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Gábor Forrai; Eszter Kovács; Éva Ambrózay; Miklós Barta; Katalin Borbély; Zsolt Lengyel; Katalin Ormándi; Zoltán Péntek; Tasnádi Tünde; Éva Sebő
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.874

6.  Breast cancer histological classification: agreement between the Office for National Statistics and the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme.

Authors:  Toral Gathani; Diana Bull; Jane Green; Gillian Reeves; Valerie Beral
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Case-mix fails to explain variation in mastectomy rates: management of screen-detected breast cancer in a UK region 1997-2003.

Authors:  L J M Caldon; S J Walters; J A Reed; A Murphy; A Worley; M W R Reed
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-01-17       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Clinical outcome data for symptomatic breast cancer: the Breast Cancer Clinical Outcome Measures (BCCOM) Project.

Authors:  T Bates; O Kearins; I Monypenny; C Lagord; G Lawrence
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.