Literature DB >> 12520465

Chemical radioprotection: a critical review of amifostine as a cytoprotector in radiotherapy.

Christian Nicolaj Andreassen1, Cai Grau, Jacob Christian Lindegaard.   

Abstract

The use of chemical radioprotectors represents an obvious strategy to improve the therapeutic index in radiotherapy. Amofostine (WR-2721) has recently been approved for use in head and neck cancer to protect against radiation-induced xerostomia. Currently, the question has arisen whether amifostine could be used for radioprotection in broader terms. Amifostine may have the potential to enable intensified treatment by ameliorating mucosal reactions that are often a limiting factor in accelerated fractionation or concomitant chemoradiation. However, it has as yet not been clarified whether sufficient amifostine to reduce mucositis can be administered before each radiation fraction without causing unacceptable toxicity. Also, the optimal dosage and schedule of amifostine in chemoradiation combinations have not yet been established. The major concern related to radioprotectiors is the potential hazard of collateral tumor protection. A number of clinical studies have concluded that amifostine does not reduce antitumor efficacy. However, not even the largest study conducted, with over 300 patients, has sufficient statistical power to detect a clinically significant reduction in tumor control rate. To put this issue ultimately to a rest, a clinical trial with a sufficient accrual to definitely rule out a tumor protective effect of amifostine needs to be conducted. Substances reducing radiation-induced toxicity by modulating the biological response to radiation injury may represent an alternative concept in radioprotection. However, such agents are still at a developmental stage. Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12520465     DOI: 10.1053/srao.2003.50006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1053-4296            Impact factor:   5.934


  43 in total

1.  The radioprotective agent WR1065 protects cells from radiation damage by regulating the activity of the Tip60 acetyltransferase.

Authors:  Ye Xu; Kalindi Parmar; Fengxia Du; Brendan D Price; Yingli Sun
Journal:  Int J Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2011-10-20

2.  Prevention of radiation-induced bone pathology through combined pharmacologic cytoprotection and angiogenic stimulation.

Authors:  Alexis Donneys; Noah S Nelson; Joseph E Perosky; Yekaterina Polyatskaya; Jose J Rodriguez; Christian Figueredo; Cheyenne A Vasseli; Hannah C Ratliff; Sagar S Deshpande; Kenneth M Kozloff; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Therapeutic effects of cytoprotective agent on breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Xinjia He; Lihua Wang; Wei Li; Zhuang Yu; Xingang Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

Review 4.  Interventions for preventing oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment.

Authors:  Helen V Worthington; Jan E Clarkson; Gemma Bryan; Susan Furness; Anne-Marie Glenny; Anne Littlewood; Martin G McCabe; Stefan Meyer; Tasneem Khalid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-04-13

5.  In vitro radioprotection studies of organoselenium compounds: differences between mono- and diselenides.

Authors:  B Santhosh Kumar; Amit Kunwar; A Ahmad; L B Kumbhare; V K Jain; K I Priyadarsini
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Serum microRNAs are early indicators of survival after radiation-induced hematopoietic injury.

Authors:  Sanket S Acharya; Wojciech Fendler; Jacqueline Watson; Abigail Hamilton; Yunfeng Pan; Emily Gaudiano; Patryk Moskwa; Payel Bhanja; Subhrajit Saha; Chandan Guha; Kalindi Parmar; Dipanjan Chowdhury
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Raman spectroscopy delineates radiation-induced injury and partial rescue by amifostine in bone: a murine mandibular model.

Authors:  Peter A Felice; Bo Gong; Salman Ahsan; Sagar S Deshpande; Noah S Nelson; Alexis Donneys; Catherine Tchanque-Fossuo; Michael D Morris; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  The role of amifostine on late normal tissue damage induced by pelvic radiotherapy with concomitant gemcitabine: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Fazilet Oner Dinçbaş; Didem Colpan Oksüz; Banu Atalar; Tuncay Altug; Sennur Ilvan; Nursal Gedik; Sevda Ozel; Sedat Koca
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2008-11-30       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Raman spectroscopy demonstrates Amifostine induced preservation of bone mineralization patterns in the irradiated murine mandible.

Authors:  Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo; Bo Gong; Behdod Poushanchi; Alexis Donneys; Deniz Sarhaddi; K Kelly Gallagher; Sagar S Deshpande; Steven A Goldstein; Michael D Morris; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Targeting of Nrf2 induces DNA damage signaling and protects colonic epithelial cells from ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Sang Bum Kim; Raj K Pandita; Ugur Eskiocak; Peter Ly; Aadil Kaisani; Rakesh Kumar; Crystal Cornelius; Woodring E Wright; Tej K Pandita; Jerry W Shay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.