Literature DB >> 12520403

Cross-axis adaptation of torsional components in the yaw-axis vestibulo-ocular reflex.

P Trillenberg1, M Shelhamer, D C Roberts, D S Zee.   

Abstract

The three pairs of semicircular canals within the labyrinth are not perfectly aligned with the pulling directions of the six extraocular muscles. Therefore, for a given head movement, the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) depends upon central neural mechanisms that couple the canals to the muscles with the appropriate functional gains in order to generate a response that rotates the eye the correct amount and around the correct axis. A consequence of these neural connections is a cross-axis adaptive capability, which can be stimulated experimentally when head rotation is around one axis and visual motion about another. From this visual-vestibular conflict the brain infers that the slow-phase eye movement is rotating around the wrong axis. We explored the capability of human cross-axis adaptation, using a short-term training paradigm, to determine if torsional eye movements could be elicited by yaw (horizontal) head rotation (where torsion is normally inappropriate). We applied yaw sinusoidal head rotation (+/-10 degrees, 0.33 Hz) and measured eye movement responses in the dark, and before and after adaptation. The adaptation paradigm lasted 45-60 min, and consisted of the identical head motion, coupled with a moving visual scene that required one of several types of eye movements: (1) torsion alone (-Roll); (2) horizontal/torsional, head right/CW torsion (Yaw-Roll); (3) horizontal/torsional, head right/CCW torsion (Yaw+Roll); (4) horizontal, vertical, torsional combined (Yaw+Pitch-Roll); and (5) horizontal and vertical together (Yaw+Pitch). The largest and most significant changes in torsional amplitude occurred in the Yaw-Roll and Yaw+Roll conditions. We conclude that short-term, cross-axis adaptation of torsion is possible but constrained by the complexity of the adaptation task: smaller torsional components are produced if more than one cross-coupling component is required. In contrast, vertical cross-axis components can be easily trained to occur with yaw head movements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Neuroscience; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12520403     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1285-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  5 in total

1.  Torsional and horizontal vestibular ocular reflex adaptation: three-dimensional eye movement analysis.

Authors:  D Solomon; D S Zee; D Straumann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Adaptation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex for forward-eyed foveate vision.

Authors:  Americo A Migliaccio; Lloyd B Minor; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Asymmetric short-term adaptation of the vertical vestibulo-ocular reflex in humans.

Authors:  Sarah Marti; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A multichannel semicircular canal neural prosthesis using electrical stimulation to restore 3-d vestibular sensation.

Authors:  Charles C Della Santina; Americo A Migliaccio; Amit H Patel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Continuous vestibular implant stimulation partially restores eye-stabilizing reflexes.

Authors:  Peter J Boutros; Desi P Schoo; Mehdi Rahman; Nicolas S Valentin; Margaret R Chow; Andrianna I Ayiotis; Brian J Morris; Andreas Hofner; Aitor Morillo Rascon; Andreas Marx; Ross Deas; Gene Y Fridman; Natan S Davidovics; Bryan K Ward; Carolina Treviño; Stephen P Bowditch; Dale C Roberts; Kelly E Lane; Yoav Gimmon; Michael C Schubert; John P Carey; Andreas Jaeger; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2019-11-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.