Literature DB >> 12519367

Genetic technologies, health care policy and the patent bargain.

T A Caulfield1, B M Knoppers, E R Gold, L E Sheremeta, P J Bridge.   

Abstract

The idea of granting patents on human genetic material continues to cause controversy. The debate is largely focussed on the moral acceptability of human gene patents, the impact of gene patents on the research environment and the value of patents to stimulate innovation and the commercialization and dissemination of genetic discoveries. As highlighted by a recent controversy in Canada, patents can also have a profound effect on health policy and access to genetic services. Creative and bold patent reform initiatives are necessary to ensure that society will, to the highest degree possible, reap the health care benefits of the genetic revolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12519367     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.630103.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  4 in total

Review 1.  Health care policy issues as a result of the genetic revolution: implications for public health.

Authors:  Rohit P Ojha; Raymond Thertulien
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Genetics and public health--evolution, or revolution?

Authors:  Jane L Halliday; Veronica R Collins; Mary Anne Aitken; Martin P M Richards; Craig A Olsson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Community leaders' perspectives on engaging African Americans in biobanks and other human genetics initiatives.

Authors:  Aaron G Buseh; Patricia E Stevens; Sandra Millon-Underwood; Leolia Townsend; Sheryl T Kelber
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-06-29

4.  The gene patent controversy on Twitter: a case study of Twitter users' responses to the CHEO lawsuit against Long QT gene patents.

Authors:  Li Du; Kalina Kamenova; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.652

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.