Literature DB >> 12518253

Differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin lispro and aspart in healthy volunteers.

M-A von Mach1, C Brinkmann, T Hansen, L S Weilemann, J Beyer.   

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of the rapid-acting insulin analogues lispro and aspart were compared in a randomized, double-blind crossover study of 20 fasting healthy men following a single subcutaneous injection. Either insulin lispro or aspart, 0.05 U/kg-body-weight, was injected subcutaneously and followed by determination of 5-h profiles of plasma glucose, serum C-peptide and insulin concentrations. Lowest glucose concentrations were observed after 50 min in the aspart group (3.2 +/- 0.1 mmol/l versus lispro 3.5 +/- 0.1 mmol/l; p = 0.026) and after 60 min in the lispro group (3.4 +/- 0.1 mmol/l). For blood glucose t min was 59.3 +/- 3.4 min in the aspart and 63.5 +/- 5.3 min in the lispro group (ns). After 40 min a lower C-peptide was determined for aspart (225 +/- 21 pmol/l versus lispro 309 +/- 33 pmol/l; p = 0.031), whereas minimal C-peptide concentrations were reached in both groups after 105 min (lispro 117 +/- 21 pmol/l versus aspart 105 +/- 18 pmol/l). The maximal concentration of insulin was detected in both groups after 40 min (lispro 20.8 +/- 1.1 mU/l versus aspart 24.6 +/- 1.3 mU/l; p = 0.032). For insulin t max was 33.0 +/- 2.6 min in the aspart versus 33.3 +/- 2.6 min in the lispro group (ns). The present results indicate a more rapid absorption of insulin aspart in comparison to insulin lispro. Higher insulin concentrations after subcutaneus injection may be advantageous in meal-related treatment of diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12518253     DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-36428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes        ISSN: 0947-7349            Impact factor:   2.949


  7 in total

1.  A subcutaneous insulin pharmacokinetic model for computer simulation in a diabetes decision support role: validation and simulation.

Authors:  Jason Wong; J Geoffrey Chase; Christopher E Hann; Geoffrey M Shaw; Thomas F Lotz; Jessica Lin; Aaron J Le Compte
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-07

Review 2.  Insulin aspart: a review of its use in the management of type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Neil A Reynolds; Antona J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  A subcutaneous insulin pharmacokinetic model for computer simulation in a diabetes decision support role: model structure and parameter identification.

Authors:  Jason Wong; J Geoffrey Chase; Christopher E Hann; Geoffrey M Shaw; Thomas F Lotz; Jessica Lin; Aaron J Le Compte
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-07

4.  Cumulative clinical experience with use of insulin lispro: critical appraisal, role in therapy, and patient considerations.

Authors:  J Uy; L Fogelfeld; Y Guerra
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.168

5.  Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Lispro and Aspart Evaluated by Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Bing-Li Liu; Guo-Ping Yin; Feng-Fei Li; Yun Hu; Jin-Dan Wu; Mao-Yuan Chen; Lei Ye; Xiao-Fei Su; Jian-Hua Ma
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.257

Review 6.  A Review of Basal-Bolus Therapy Using Insulin Glargine and Insulin Lispro in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Riccardo Candido; Kathleen Wyne; Ester Romoli
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 2.945

Review 7.  Insulin Aspart in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus: 15 Years of Clinical Experience.

Authors:  Kjeld Hermansen; Mette Bohl; Anne Grethe Schioldan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 9.546

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.