Literature DB >> 12517642

Screening interval and risk of invasive squamous cell cervical cancer.

Marie Grisham Miller1, Hai-Yen Sung, George F Sawaya, Kathleen A Kearney, Walter Kinney, Robert A Hiatt.   

Abstract

To compare the risks of developing invasive squamous cell cervical cancer associated with screening intervals of 1, 2, and 3 years after a negative cervical smear. We conducted a matched case-control study of invasive squamous cell cervical cancer patients (n = 482) diagnosed between 1983 and 1995 among long-term members of a large health maintenance organization. Controls were matched for age, length of membership, and race (n = 934). Screening interval was time between the last negative cervical smear and the case diagnosis date. The main outcome measure was the relative odds of invasive disease associated with 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year intervals. The odds ratio for a 2-year versus a 1-year interval was 1.72 (95% confidence interval 1.12, 2.64, P =.013) and for a 3-year versus a 1-year interval was 2.06 (95% confidence interval 1.21, 3.50, P =.007). The odds ratio for a 3-year versus a 2-year interval was 1.20 (95% confidence interval 0.65, 2.21, P =.561). Controlling for ever having had an abnormal cervical smear or a previous consecutive negative smear did not substantially change these results. In this large health plan, the relative risks of invasive squamous cell cervical cancer were significantly greater for 2-year and 3-year cervical cancer screening intervals compared with a 1-year interval, but not for a 3-year interval compared with a 2-year interval. Our findings need to be placed in the context of the low absolute risks of developing invasive cervical cancer during the first 3 years after a negative cervical smear before making policy recommendation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12517642     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02454-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  11 in total

1.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Diane Solomon; Herschel W Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna Cain; Francisco A R Garcia; Ann T Moriarty; Alan G Waxman; David C Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L Franco; Mark H Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Evan R Myers
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Recommendations on screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  James Dickinson; Eva Tsakonas; Sarah Conner Gorber; Gabriela Lewin; Elizabeth Shaw; Harminder Singh; Michel Joffres; Richard Birtwhistle; Marcello Tonelli; Verna Mai; Meg McLachlin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Making Sense of Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines and Recommendations.

Authors:  Michelle Davis; Sarah Feldman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-12

Review 4.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Diane Solomon; Herschel W Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna M Cain; Francisco A R Garcia; Ann T Moriarty; Alan G Waxman; David C Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L Franco; Mark H Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Evan R Myers; David Chelmow; Abbe Herzig; Jane J Kim; Walter Kinney; W Lawson Herschel; Jeffrey Waldman
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  A population-based evaluation of cervical screening in the United States: 2008-2011.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick; Orrin Myers; William C Hunt; Michael Robertson; Nancy E Joste; Philip E Castle; Vicki B Benard; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Performance of papanicolaou testing and detection of cervical carcinoma in situ in participants of organized cervical cancer screening in South Korea.

Authors:  Mi Ah Han; Kui Son Choi; Hoo-Yeon Lee; Jae Kwan Jun; Kyu Won Jung; Sokbom Kang; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Exposure Definition in Case-Control Studies of Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Alejandra Castanon; Aruna Kamineni; K Miriam Elfström; Anita W W Lim; Peter Sasieni
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 8.  Screening for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leslea Peirson; Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis; Donna Ciliska; Rachel Warren
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2013-05-24

9.  Early impact and performance characteristics of an established anal dysplasia screening program: program evaluation considerations.

Authors:  Christopher Mathews; Joseph Caperna; Edward R Cachay; Bard Cosman
Journal:  Open AIDS J       Date:  2007-11-29

Review 10.  Current Cervical Carcinoma Screening Guidelines.

Authors:  Megan J Schlichte; Jacqueline Guidry
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.