Literature DB >> 12517463

Accuracy of pharmaceutical advertisements in medical journals.

Pilar Villanueva1, Salvador Peiró, Julián Librero, Inmaculada Pereiró.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because of the effect of the ever-growing evidence-based medicine movement on prescribing behaviour of doctors, the pharmaceutical industry incorporates bibliographical references to clinical trials that endorse their products in their advertisements. We aimed to assess whether the references about efficacy, safety, convenience, or cost of antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs included in advertisements supported the promotional claims.
METHODS: We assessed all advertisements for antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs published in six Spanish medical journals in 1997 that had at least one bibliographical reference. Two pairs of investigators independently reviewed the advertisements to see whether the studies quoted to endorse the advertising messages supported the corresponding claims.
FINDINGS: We identified 264 different advertisements for antihypertensive drugs and 23 different advertisements for lipid-lowering drugs. We recorded at least one reference in 31 advertisements in the antihypertensive group and at least one reference in every seven advertisements in the lipid-lowering group, providing a total of 125 promotional claims with references. We could not retrieve 23 (18%) references from monographic works and non-published data on file. 79 (63%) of the 125 references were from journals with a high impact factor; 84 (82%) of the 102 references retrieved were from randomised clinical trials. In 45 claims (44.1%; 95% CI 34.3-54.3) the promotional statement was not supported by the reference, most frequently because the slogan recommended the drug in a patient group other than that assessed in the study.
INTERPRETATION: Doctors should be cautious in assessment of advertisements that claim a drug has greater efficacy, safety, or convenience, even though these claims are accompanied by bibliographical references to randomised clinical trials published in reputable medical journals and seem to be evidence-based.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12517463     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12118-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  29 in total

1.  Medical journals and pharmaceutical companies: uneasy bedfellows.

Authors:  Richard Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-31

2.  The availability of references and the sponsorship of original research cited in pharmaceutical advertisements.

Authors:  Richelle J Cooper; David L Schriger
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Pharmaceutical advertisements in medical journals received in a medical clinic: are we having "too much of a good thing"?

Authors:  Sapna Lohiya
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 4.  Financial ties and concordance between results and conclusions in meta-analyses: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Veronica Yank; Drummond Rennie; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-11-16

5.  The association between a journal's source of revenue and the drug recommendations made in the articles it publishes.

Authors:  Annette Becker; Fatma Dörter; Kirsten Eckhardt; Annika Viniol; Erika Baum; Michael M Kochen; Joel Lexchin; Karl Wegscheider; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Unwarranted claims of drug efficacy in pharmaceutical sales visits: are drugs approved on the basis of surrogate outcomes promoted appropriately?

Authors:  Roojin Habibi; Joel Lexchin; Barbara Mintzes; Anne Holbrook
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Quality of claims, references and the presentation of risk results in medical journal advertising: a comparative study in Australia, Malaysia and the United States.

Authors:  Noordin Othman; Agnes I Vitry; Elizabeth E Roughead
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Evaluation of rationality of promotional drug literature using World Health Organization guidelines.

Authors:  Smita N Mali; Sujata Dudhgaonkar; N P Bachewar
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.200

Review 9.  Quality of pharmaceutical advertisements in medical journals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noordin Othman; Agnes Vitry; Elizabeth E Roughead
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Why open medicine?

Authors:  James Maskalyk
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2007-04-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.