Literature DB >> 12517348

Depth of strategic reasoning in games.

Andrew M. Colman1.   

Abstract

Orthodox game theory assumes indefinitely recursive reasoning ('I think that you think that I think em leader '), but human decision-makers, who are limited by bounded rationality, cannot handle limitless layers of complexity. Recent research corroborates earlier findings that human players tend to operate at only one or two levels of strategic depth.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 12517348     DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00006-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  3 in total

1.  Someone has to give in: theta oscillations correlate with adaptive behavior in social bargaining.

Authors:  Pablo Billeke; Francisco Zamorano; Tamara López; Carlos Rodriguez; Diego Cosmelli; Francisco Aboitiz
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  What eye movements can tell about theory of mind in a strategic game.

Authors:  Ben Meijering; Hedderik van Rijn; Niels A Taatgen; Rineke Verbrugge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Theory of mind: did evolution fool us?

Authors:  Marie Devaine; Guillaume Hollard; Jean Daunizeau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.