Literature DB >> 12517036

Wisdom, casuistry, and the goal of reproductive counseling.

Anders Nordgren1.   

Abstract

Reproductive counseling includes counseling of prospective parents by obstetricians, clinical geneticists, and genetic counselors regarding, for example, the use of assisted reproductive technologies, prenatal testing, and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Two different views on wisdom and the goal of reproductive counseling are analyzed. According to the first view, the goal of reproductive counseling is to help prospective parents reach a wise decision. A specific course of action is recommended by the counselor in contrast to other possible alternatives. According to the second view, the goal of reproductive counseling is not to help prospective parents reach a wise decision but to help them reach their own decision wisely. It is the prospective parents who should make the decision, and it is their value commitments that should be decisive. It is argued that the second approach is to be preferred to the first. It combines respect for autonomy with a recognition of the need for assistance in decision-making. Both the first and second views relate the goal of reproductive counseling to wisdom. A problem is, however, what wisdom more precisely means - there are many different views. A casuistic view of wisdom is investigated. This view roughly defines wisdom as practical prudence in dealing with particular cases. What characterizes a casuistic decision-making method is elaborated in more detail. Applied to the second view, a casuistic view of wisdom implies that the counselor should encourage prospective parents to take into consideration the nature of the particular problem at hand, the context of the problem, their own individual identities, their personal value commitments, and various alternative perspectives, values and arguments.

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12517036     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021105606636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  11 in total

Review 1.  The future of genetic counselling: an international perspective.

Authors:  B Bowles Biesecker; T M Marteau
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Casuistry: an alternative or complement to principles?

Authors:  Albert R Jonsen
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  1995-09

3.  Reprogenetics policy: three kinds of models.

Authors:  Anders Nordgren
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  1998

4.  Twice-told tales: stories about genetic disorders.

Authors:  A Lippman; B S Wilfond
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Medical genetic services in Latin America: report of a meeting of experts.

Authors:  V B Penchaszadeh; B Beiguelman
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  1998-06

6.  "Prevention" and the goals of genetic medicine.

Authors:  E T Juengst
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.695

7.  Prenatal genetic testing: content of discussions between obstetric providers and pregnant women.

Authors:  B A Bernhardt; G Geller; T Doksum; S M Larson; D Roter; N A Holtzman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 8.  Ethics and imagination. Implications of cognitive semantics for medical ethics.

Authors:  A Nordgren
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1998-04

9.  After bioethics and towards virtue?

Authors:  P D Toon
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Counselling following diagnosis of fetal abnormality: a comparison between German, Portuguese and UK geneticists.

Authors:  T Marteau; H Drake; M Reid; M Feijoo; M Soares; I Nippert; P Nippert; M Bobrow
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.