Literature DB >> 12517031

Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw: autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability--towards a foundation of bioethics and biolaw.

Jacob Dahl Rendtorff1.   

Abstract

This article summarizes some of the results of the BIOMED II project "Basic Ethical Principles in European Bioethics and Biolaw" (1995-1998) connected to a research project of the Danish Research Councils "Bioethics and Law" (1993-1998). The BIOMED project was based on cooperation between 22 partners in most EU countries. The aim of the project was to identify the ethical principles of respect for autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability as four important ideas or values for a European bioethics and biolaw. The research concluded that the basic ethical principles cannot be understood as universal everlasting ideas or transcendental truths but they rather function reflective guidelines and important values in European culture. The method of the research was conceptual, philosophical analysis of the cultural background of the four values or normative ideas that people use and find important in their existence. Moreover, this was combined with analysis of empirical legal material and policy documents. Also, a number of qualitative interviews with relevant experts were carried out. Another important result of the BIOMED project was the partner's Policy Proposals to the European Commission, the Barcelona Declaration, unique as a philosophical and political agreement between experts in bioethics and biolaw from many different countries. The Policy Proposals are reprinted here at the end of the article.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12517031     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021132602330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  30 in total

1.  The conflation of competence and capacity in english medical law: a philosophical critique.

Authors:  Philip Bielby
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2005

Review 2.  How to handle informed consent in longitudinal studies when participants have a limited understanding of the study.

Authors:  G Helgesson; J Ludvigsson; U Gustafsson Stolt
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  [Instruction in medical ethics during clinical training for medical students: report on experience in radio-oncology].

Authors:  C Schäfer; C Lenk; O Kölbl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Some methodological aspects of ethics committees' expertise: the Ukrainian example.

Authors:  Svitlana V Pustovit
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Justifying surgery's last taboo: the ethics of face transplants.

Authors:  Michael Freeman; Pauline Abou Jaoudé
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Using empirical research to formulate normative ethical principles in biomedicine.

Authors:  Mette Ebbesen; Birthe D Pedersen
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2006-09-06

7.  What is the scope for the interpretation of dignity in research involving human subjects?

Authors:  Lawrence Burns
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2007-10-16

8.  Communicating genetic information in the family: enriching the debate through the notion of integrity.

Authors:  Paula Boddington; Maggie Gregory
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2008-04-09

Review 9.  Assumptions and moral understanding of the wish to hasten death: a philosophical review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Andrea Rodríguez-Prat; Evert van Leeuwen
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2018-03

10.  Ethical dimension of paediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  R Nunes
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2001-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.