Literature DB >> 12516839

The ontological status of human DNA: is it not first and foremost a biological "file self"?

Rogeer Hoedemaekers1, Wim Dekkers.   

Abstract

This paper investigates which of the various legal notions proposed for human DNA is the most appropriate from an ontological viewpoint - unique legal status, private property, common property, person, or information. The focus is on the difficulties that private property, common property and person present. By using Harré's notion of "file-self" we argue that, ontologically, the most appropriate legal notion to be applied is information. This has consequences for storage, control and use of genetic information as well as identifiable human body material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12516839     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021263520948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth        ISSN: 1386-7415


  10 in total

1.  Policy forum: genetic technologies. Commercialization of genetic research and public policy.

Authors:  B M Knoppers; M Hirtle; K C Glass
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-12-17       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  The troublesome concept of the person.

Authors:  B Gordijn
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1999-08

3.  Is there a unique moral status of human DNA that prevents patenting?

Authors:  R Hoedemaekers; W Dekkers
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2001-12

Review 4.  Led (astray) by genetic maps: the cartography of the human genome and health care.

Authors:  A Lippman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Status, sale and patenting of human genetic material: an international survey.

Authors:  B M Knoppers
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Ownership of genetic material and information.

Authors:  J I de Witte; H ten Have
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Intellectual property rights in genes and gene fragments: a registration solution for expressed sequence tags.

Authors:  M A Holman; S R Munzer
Journal:  Iowa Law Rev       Date:  2000-03

Review 8.  Prenatal genetic testing and screening: constructing needs and reinforcing inequities.

Authors:  A Lippman
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  1991

9.  Geneticization: the Cyprus paradigm.

Authors:  R Hoedemaekers; H ten Have
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  1998-06

10.  My body, my property.

Authors:  L B Andrews
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.683

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.