Literature DB >> 12516099

Does skin fibroblast radiosensitivity predict squamous cancer cell radiosensitivity of the same individual?

Johanna Haikonen1, Virpi Rantanen, Kirsi Pekkola, Jarmo Kulmala, Reidar Grénman.   

Abstract

Individualization of radiation doses is presumed to result in better radiotherapy outcome. Success rate in measuring radiosensitivity is probably the most limiting factor for present radiosensitivity assays to be introduced into clinical routine. To find a simpler predictive parameter, we compared the radiosensitivity of dermal fibroblasts and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cell lines established from the same individuals. The radiosensitivity was tested using the clonogenic 96-well plate assay. The surviving fraction at 2.0 Gy (SF2) was determined, as well as the mean inactivation dose (AUC) of cancer cells. SF2 of SCC cell lines and skin fibroblasts were 0.25-0.44 and 0.11-0.43, respectively. AUC of SCC cells was 1.4-2.1 Gy. Dermal fibroblasts were more radiosensitive than SCC cells in 14 of 15 cases. In 1 patient (UT-SCC-8), cancer cells were found to be more radiosensitive than corresponding dermal fibroblasts. There was a clear tendency to a correlation between radiosensitivities of these 2 cell types, but statistical significance was reached only when the data of UT-SCC-8 was excluded. In our material, the intrinsic radiosensitivity of head and neck SCC cells could in most cases be predicted from the intrinsic radiosensitivity of dermal fibroblasts established from the same individual. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12516099     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.10890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  6 in total

1.  A comparison of cell survival and heat shock protein expression after radiation in normal dermal fibroblasts, microvascular endothelial cells, and different head and neck squamous carcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  Dominique Muschter; Fabian Geyer; Richard Bauer; Tobias Ettl; Stephan Schreml; Frank Haubner
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Pre-clinical characterization of Dacomitinib (PF-00299804), an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor, combined with ionizing radiation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Justin P Williams; Inki Kim; Emma Ito; Wei Shi; Shijun Yue; Lillian L Siu; John Waldron; Brian O'Sullivan; Kenneth W Yip; Fei-Fei Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Differences in Phosphorylated Histone H2AX Foci Formation and Removal of Cells Exposed to Low and High Linear Energy Transfer Radiation.

Authors:  Thomas Ernst Schmid; Olga Zlobinskaya; Gabriele Multhoff
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.236

4.  Differences in the nemosis response of normal and cancer-associated fibroblasts from patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Kati Räsänen; Ismo Virtanen; Pertteli Salmenperä; Reidar Grenman; Antti Vaheri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  FHOD1, a formin upregulated in epithelial-mesenchymal transition, participates in cancer cell migration and invasion.

Authors:  Maria Gardberg; Katja Kaipio; Laura Lehtinen; Piia Mikkonen; Vanina D Heuser; Kati Talvinen; Kristiina Iljin; Caroline Kampf; Mathias Uhlen; Reidar Grénman; Mari Koivisto; Olli Carpén
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Is grid therapy useful for all tumors and every grid block design?

Authors:  Somayeh Gholami; Hassan Ali Nedaie; Francesco Longo; Mohammad Reza Ay; Stacey Wright; Ali S Meigooni
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.