Literature DB >> 1251608

High risk perinatal care in California.

W E Hawes, J Hodgman.   

Abstract

Rates of perinatal mortality are still too high in California. Mortality and morbidity, particularly for high risk pregnancies, can be reduced by the use of modern technology in the hands of highly trained personnel. New goals for perinatal care have been published by the California Medical Association reflecting these changes. This kind of care is too costly to be developed in all the small obstetric units presently providing services in California. Consolidation of obstetric and neonatal units into fewer hospitals can make it economically possible for these units to meet present-day standards.

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1251608      PMCID: PMC1129989     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  10 in total

1.  Fetal monitoring: is it worth it?

Authors:  E J Quilligan; R H Paul
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  The use of the oxytocin challenge test for antepartum clinical evaluation of uteroplacental respiratory function.

Authors:  R K Freeman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1975-02-15       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Annual summary of vital statistics--1973.

Authors:  M E Wegman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Prenatal and intrapartum high-risk screening. I. Prediction of the high-rish neonate.

Authors:  C J Hobel; M A Hyvarinen; D M Okada; W Oh
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1973-09-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  New method of intrauterine evaluation by the combined use of fetoscopy and ultrasound.

Authors:  J C Hobbins; M J Mahoney; L A Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1974-04-15       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  Mothers separated from their newborn infants.

Authors:  M H Klaus; J H Kennell
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 3.278

7.  Hospital and related characteristics associated with perinatal mortality.

Authors:  G K Tokuhata; V G Colflesh; K Ramaswamy; L A Mann; E Digon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Diagnosis of the respiratory distress syndrome by amniocentesis.

Authors:  L Gluck; M V Kulovich; R C Borer; P H Brenner; G G Anderson; W N Spellacy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1971-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Amniotic fluid tests for fetal maturity.

Authors:  T A Doran; R J Benzie; J L Harkins; V M Owen; C J Porter; D W Thompson; S I Liedgren
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1974-07-15       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  Clinical implications of perinatal mortality statistics.

Authors:  R H Usher
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.190

  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Status of infant and perinatal morbidity and mortality: a review of the literature.

Authors:  H M Wallace
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1978 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Intrauterine growth curves of weight, length, and head circumference for a predominantly Hispanic infant population.

Authors:  T Aguilar; A J Teberg; L Chan; J E Hodgman
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.