Literature DB >> 12515088

Macular holes.

Michael Landolfi1, Marco A Zarbin, Neelakshi Bhagat.   

Abstract

Spontaneous closure of macular holes occurs in 3% to 9% of patients over 6 years [3,58]. Visual acuity can recover dramatically once the hole closes. The risk for hole development in the fellow eye in the absence of PVD is approximately 29%. The presence of vitreomacular separation reduces the risk to less than 5%. Most of the fellow eyes that develop macular holes do so within 2 years [59]. Macular hole surgery has been evolving. ILM peeling is a recent, widely accepted innovation. Meta-analysis of 12 published case series indicates anatomic success in 77% and functional success in 55% of patients with the traditional technique of epiretinal peeling and no adjuvant use. Meta-analysis of 22 series with techniques using adjuvants indicates an anatomic success rate of 81% and a functional success rate of 60%. Meta-analysis of 4 studies involving 221 cases indicates an anatomic success rate of 96% and a functional success rate of 81% [5]. True superiority of one approach versus another cannot be determined without a randomized, prospective clinical trial, which is unlikely to be conducted. In the meantime, surgeons must choose an approach based on individual features of a given patient and their own surgical experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12515088     DOI: 10.1016/s0896-1549(02)00047-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0896-1549


  8 in total

1.  [Morphology of the vitreoretinal interface in fellow eyes of patients with full thickness macular holes].

Authors:  J E Klaas; S Burzer; S Abraham; N Feucht; C P Lohmann; M Maier
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  Complications of Macular Peeling.

Authors:  Mónica Asencio-Duran; Beatriz Manzano-Muñoz; José Luis Vallejo-García; Jesús García-Martínez
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 3.  A Review of Surgical Outcomes and Advances for Macular Holes.

Authors:  Peng-Peng Zhao; Shuang Wang; Nan Liu; Zhi-Min Shu; Jin-Song Zhao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Comparative study of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap and ILM peeling technique in large macular holes: a randomized-control trial.

Authors:  Naresh Babu Kannan; Piyush Kohli; Haemoglobin Parida; O O Adenuga; Kim Ramasamy
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Comparison of platelet-rich plasma and inverted internal limiting membrane flap for the management of large macular holes: A pilot study.

Authors:  Naresh Babu; Piyush Kohli; N Obuli Ramachandran; Olukorede O Adenuga; Ashish Ahuja; Kim Ramasamy
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Surgical outcome of full-thickness macular hole secondary to tractional retinal detachment in proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Naresh Babu; Piyush Kohli; Chitaranjan Mishra; Renu P Rajan; Karthik Kumar; Kim Ramasamy; Reshma Dara; C Chandra Lakshmi
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 7.  Novel Applications of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-derived Exosomes for Myocardial Infarction Therapeutics.

Authors:  Sho Joseph Ozaki Tan; Juliana Ferreria Floriano; Laura Nicastro; Costanza Emanueli; Francesco Catapano
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-05-02

8.  Retrospective study of changes in ocular coherence tomography characteristics after failed macular hole surgery and outcomes of fluid-gas exchange for persistent macular hole.

Authors:  M Y Vishal; Naresh Babu; Piyush Kohli; Anand Rajendran; Kim Ramasamy
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.848

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.