Literature DB >> 12514650

Adherence to practice guidelines: the role of specialty society guidelines.

Lucian L Leape1, Joel S Weissman, Eric C Schneider, Robert N Piana, Constantine Gatsonis, Arnold M Epstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physician adherence to guidelines is often poor, but the reasons have not been completely studied. We investigated whether physician adherence to guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) varied by source, development methods, or the extent of their evidence-base. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We assessed adherence to guidelines developed by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) for PTCA (1988 and 1993) and for CABG (1990) and guidelines developed by RAND for PTCA and CABG in 1990. We randomly sampled patients on Medicare who were undergoing coronary angiography in 5 states in 1991 and 1992, extracting clinical and laboratory data from medical records and using computer programs to classify the appropriateness of each procedure. A total of 543 PTCA and 676 CABG procedures were studied. By use of the 1988 ACC/AHA guidelines, 30% of PTCAs were rated class III (inappropriate), whereas 24% were class III by use of the 1993 guidelines. Only 1.5% of CABG procedures were class III with ACC/AHA guidelines. By use of RAND guidelines, 12% of PTCA and 9% of CABG procedures were classified as inappropriate.
CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to guidelines is higher when the recommendations are supported by evidence from randomized clinical trials (CABG). The credibility of the source and familiarity with the guidelines do not ensure compliance. When evidence is lacking, as with PTCA at the time of this study, guideline recommendations may lag behind appropriate changes in clinical practice. More frequent revisions coupled with on-line access have the potential to make guidelines more useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12514650     DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2003.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  17 in total

1.  Sex/gender differences in cardiovascular disease prevention: what a difference a decade makes.

Authors:  Lori Mosca; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Nanette Kass Wenger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Antimicrobial prescribing in the USA for adult acute pharyngitis in relation to treatment guidelines.

Authors:  Steven Y Hong; Ying Taur; Michael R Jordan; Christine Wanke
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Use of a computerized guideline for glucose regulation in the intensive care unit improved both guideline adherence and glucose regulation.

Authors:  Emmy Rood; Robert Jan Bosman; Johan Ids van der Spoel; Paul Taylor; Durk Freark Zandstra
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Treatment Sequences and Pharmacy Costs of 2 New Therapies for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Lorie A Ellis; Marie-Hélène Lafeuille; Laurence Gozalo; Dominic Pilon; Patrick Lefebvre; Scott McKenzie
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2015-06

5.  Factors associated with ordering laboratory monitoring of high-risk medications.

Authors:  Shira H Fischer; Jennifer Tjia; George Reed; Daniel Peterson; Jerry H Gurwitz; Terry S Field
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  How do SAGES members rate its guidelines?

Authors:  William W Hope; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy revisited.

Authors:  Nathalie R Rosenberg; Marinus Vermeulen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  An examination of factors influencing the choice of therapy for patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Shashivadan P Hirani; Jonathan A Hyam; Shahzad Shaefi; John M Walker; Robin K Walesby; Stanton P Newman
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  Randomized controlled trial of a mailed toolkit to increase use of body mass index percentiles to screen for childhood obesity.

Authors:  Barbara A Dennison; Joseph Nicholas; Rachel de Long; Megan Prokorym; Ian Brissette
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 10.  Evidence based practice in postgraduate healthcare education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gemma Flores-Mateo; Josep M Argimon
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.