Literature DB >> 12514592

Evaluation of 4-mm to 7-mm versus 6-mm prosthetic brachial-antecubital forearm loop access for hemodialysis: results of a randomized multicenter clinical trial.

Ruben Dammers1, R Nils Planken, Katrien P m Pouls, Rob J Van Det, Hens Burger, Frank M Van Der Sande, Jan H m Tordoir.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prosthetic arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis vascular access have a high incidence rate of thrombotic occlusions that result in graft failure. This randomized multicenter study was performed to assess the patency rates and the effect of 4-mm to 7-mm grafts on the development of stenoses.
METHODS: A total of 109 patients who needed vascular access for hemodialysis were randomized to receive either 6-mm (n = 57) or 4-mm to 7-mm prosthetic brachial-antecubital forearm loop accesses (polytetrafluoroethylene). Duplex scanning, with measurement of blood flow and peak systolic velocity and detection of stenoses (>50%), was performed at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Clinical data were obtained in a prospective manner and primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis. Statistical analysis was performed with the independent samples t test and chi(2) test.
RESULTS: At 1 year, patency rates were similar for both 4-mm to 7-mm and 6-mm prostheses (primary, 46% versus 43%; assisted primary, 62% versus 58%; secondary, 87% versus 91%). The incidence rate of thrombotic occlusion was comparable for both groups (0.74/patient-year versus 0.88/patient-year; P >.05). Mean graft flow at 1, 6, and 12 months was 1416 versus 1415 mL/min, 1345 versus 1319 mL/min, and 1595 versus 1265 mL/min (P >.05) for 4-mm to 7-mm and 6-mm grafts, respectively. Also, no differences in peak systolic velocities in any part of the grafts were observed. The percentage of stenoses detected was equal in both groups at 1 year after surgery (27% versus 20%; P >.05).
CONCLUSION: A 4-mm to 7-mm tapered prosthetic brachial-antecubital forearm loop access did not reduce the incidence rates of stenoses and thrombotic occlusions compared with a 6-mm prosthetic conduit. Moreover, no differences in patency rates were observed. Therefore, we believe that the 4-mm to 7-mm graft should not be used routinely for hemodialysis vascular access.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12514592     DOI: 10.1067/mva.2002.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  5 in total

1.  An early study on the mechanisms that allow tissue-engineered vascular grafts to resist intimal hyperplasia.

Authors:  Heather L Prichard; Roberto J Manson; Louis DiBernardo; Laura E Niklason; Jeffrey H Lawson; Shannon L M Dahl
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  [Vascular grafts as access for hemodialysis].

Authors:  J Zanow; U Settmacher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Tailoring of arteriovenous graft-to-vein anastomosis angle to attenuate pathological flow fields.

Authors:  Dillon Williams; Eric C Leuthardt; Guy M Genin; Mohamed Zayed
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Surgical Outcomes of Forearm Loop Arteriovenous Fistula Formation Using Tapered versus Non-Tapered Polytetrafluoroethylene Grafts.

Authors:  Sun Han; Pil Won Seo; Jae-Wook Ryu
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-05

5.  Prosthetic Hemodialysis Access-induced Distal Hand Ischemia and its Contributors in Diabetics.

Authors:  S M Alamshah; I Nazari; A Nahidi; M Sametzadeh; S Khodabakhshi
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2017 May-Jun
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.