Literature DB >> 12514075

Outcomes for vasovasostomy with bilateral intravasal azoospermia.

Peter N Kolettis1, Anna M D'Amico, Lyndon Box, John R Burns.   

Abstract

We conducted an evaluation of outcomes for microsurgical vasectomy reversal in which sperm are absent from the vas fluid in order to determine a threshold obstructive interval when vasoepididymostomy (VE) may be indicated. Vasectomy reversal was performed for 32 patients with intravasal azoospermia: 25 received bilateral vasovasostomy (VV), 1 had a bilateral VV, 5 underwent VV/VE, and 1 had bilateral VE. Overall, the patency rate was 50% (14 of 28). Five pregnancies (20%) and 3 live births (12%) occurred in 25 patients with sufficient follow-up. One pregnancy was electively terminated and the other is ongoing, for an ongoing or delivered rate of 16%. The patency rate for VV (either bilateral or unilateral) was 55% (12 of 22). Median obstructive interval was 7 years in patent and 15 years in nonpatent cases, respectively, (P =.0027). Sperm were not observed after VV in any case n which the obstructive interval was greater than 11 years. If VV was limited to obstructive intervals of 11 years or less, then the patency rate was 80% (12 of 15) and the pregnancy rate was 38% (5 of 13). The patency rate for bilateral VV was 67% (8 of 12) if clear fluid was observed on at least one side. We conclude that VE is not required in every case of intravasal azoospermia, but it could improve success rates in this setting. Based on our experience, VE may be indicated for intravasal azoospermia if the obstructive interval is more than 11 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12514075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Androl        ISSN: 0196-3635


  6 in total

Review 1.  The evolution and refinement of vasoepididymostomy techniques.

Authors:  Peter T Chan
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 2.  Association between the presence of sperm in the vasal fluid during vasectomy reversal and postoperative patency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jason M Scovell; Douglas A Mata; Ranjith Ramasamy; Lindsey A Herrel; Wayland Hsiao; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Current techniques in microsurgical reversal surgery.

Authors:  Dominick J Carbone; Joseph J Phillips
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 4.  Obstructive azoospermia: reconstructive techniques and results.

Authors:  Karen Baker; Edmund Sabanegh
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  The significance of sperm heads and tails within the vasal fluid during vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  Ryan P Smith; Abhinav Khanna; Jason R Kovac; Niraj Badhiwala; Robert Coward; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-04

Review 6.  Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade.

Authors:  Takeshi Namekawa; Takashi Imamoto; Mayuko Kato; Akira Komiya; Tomohiko Ichikawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.