Literature DB >> 12513918

NASA light-emitting diodes for the prevention of oral mucositis in pediatric bone marrow transplant patients.

Harry T Whelan1, James F Connelly, Brian D Hodgson, Lori Barbeau, A Charles Post, George Bullard, Ellen V Buchmann, Mary Kane, Noel T Whelan, Ann Warwick, David Margolis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of prophylactic near-infrared light therapy from light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in pediatric bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients. BACKGROUND DATA: Oral mucositis (OM) is a frequent side effect of chemotherapy that leads to increased morbidity. Near-infrared light has been shown to produce biostimulatory effects in tissues, and previous results using near-infrared lasers have shown improvement in OM indices. However, LEDs may hold greater potential for clinical applications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 32 consecutive pediatric patients undergoing myeloablative therapy in preparation for BMT. Patients were examined by two of three pediatric dentists trained in assessing the Schubert oral mucositis index (OMI) for left and right buccal and lateral tongue mucosal surfaces, while the patients were asked to rate their current left and right mouth pain, left and right xerostomia, and throat pain. LED therapy consisted of daily treatment at a fluence of 4 J/cm(2) using a 670-nm LED array held to the left extraoral epithelium starting on the day of transplant, with a concurrent sham treatment on the right. Patients were assessed before BMT and every 2-3 days through posttransplant day 14. Outcomes included the percentage of patients with ulcerative oral mucositis (UOM) compared to historical epidemiological controls, the comparison of left and right buccal pain to throat pain, and the comparison between sides of the buccal and lateral tongue OMI and buccal pain.
RESULTS: The incidence of UOM was 53%, compared to an expected rate of 70-90%. There was also a 48% and 39% reduction of treated left and right buccal pain, respectively, compared to untreated throat pain at about posttransplant day 7 (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between sides in OMI or pain.
CONCLUSION: Although more studies are needed, LED therapy appears useful in the prevention of OM in pediatric BMT patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12513918     DOI: 10.1089/104454702320901107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Laser Med Surg        ISSN: 1044-5471


  30 in total

1.  LED (660 nm) and laser (670 nm) use on skin flap viability: angiogenesis and mast cells on transition line.

Authors:  Michele A Nishioka; Carlos E Pinfildi; Tatiana Rodrigues Sheliga; Victor E Arias; Heitor C Gomes; Lydia M Ferreira
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  The relative antimicrobial effect of blue 405 nm LED and blue 405 nm laser on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in vitro.

Authors:  Daniela Santos Masson-Meyers; Violet Vakunseh Bumah; Gabriel Biener; Valerica Raicu; Chukuka Samuel Enwemeka
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Low-level laser therapy prevents severe oral mucositis in patients submitted to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Betânia Ferreira; Fabiana Moura da Motta Silveira; Flávia Augusta de Orange
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Interventions for preventing oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment.

Authors:  Helen V Worthington; Jan E Clarkson; Gemma Bryan; Susan Furness; Anne-Marie Glenny; Anne Littlewood; Martin G McCabe; Stefan Meyer; Tasneem Khalid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-04-13

5.  Effects of LED phototherapy on bone defects grafted with MTA, bone morphogenetic proteins and guided bone regeneration: a Raman spectroscopic study.

Authors:  Antonio L B Pinheiro; Luiz G P Soares; Maria Cristina T Cangussú; Nicole R S Santos; Artur Felipe S Barbosa; Landulfo Silveira Júnior
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Low-level laser therapy for treatment of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in childhood: a randomized double-blind controlled study.

Authors:  Francesca Amadori; Elena Bardellini; Giulio Conti; Nicola Pedrini; Richard Fabian Schumacher; Alessandra Majorana
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Neuroprotective effects of near-infrared light in an in vivo model of mitochondrial optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Julio C Rojas; Jung Lee; Joseph M John; F Gonzalez-Lima
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Management of Mucositis During Chemotherapy: From Pathophysiology to Pragmatic Therapeutics.

Authors:  Ysabella Z A Van Sebille; Romany Stansborough; Hannah R Wardill; Emma Bateman; Rachel J Gibson; Dorothy M Keefe
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Low-intensity light therapy: exploring the role of redox mechanisms.

Authors:  Joseph Tafur; Paul J Mills
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Effect of LED photobiomodulation on fluorescent light induced changes in cellular ATPases and Cytochrome c oxidase activity in Wistar rat.

Authors:  Ahamed Basha A; Mathangi D C; Shyamala R
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.