Literature DB >> 12512989

Plaque removal efficacy of a battery-operated power toothbrush compared to two control manual toothbrushes in single use studies.

Paul Heins1, Robert D Bartizek, Patricia A Walters, Aaron R Biesbrock.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recently, a power toothbrush (Crest SpinBrush) has been reported to remove plaque more effectively than a manual toothbrush (Colgate Navigator). The objective of these studies was to compare the plaque removal efficacy of two control manual toothbrushes (Colgate Wave and Colgate Plus) to an experimental power toothbrush (Crest SpinBrush). The Colgate Plus has an ordinary flat bristle trim design, while the Colgate Wave has an advanced design multilevel bristle trim for greater interproximal penetration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each of these two studies were randomized, controlled, examiner-blind, 4-period crossover designs which examined plaque removal with the experimental toothbrush relative to a control manual toothbrush following a single use in 37 and 35 subjects, respectively. Plaque was scored before and after brushing using the Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Index.
RESULTS: In the first study, average baseline plaque scores were 2.88 and 2.89 for the experimental toothbrush and advanced designed manual control toothbrush (Colgate Wave) treatment groups, respectively. With respect to all surfaces examined, the experimental toothbrush delivered an adjusted (via analysis of covariance) mean difference between baseline and post-brushing plaque scores of 0.70 while the control toothbrush delivered an adjusted mean difference of 0.59. The difference between the brushes was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The experimental toothbrush removed, on average, 19.9% more plaque than the control toothbrush. In the second study, baseline plaque scores averaged 3.07 and 3.04 for the experimental toothbrush and ordinary flat trim manual control toothbrush (Colgate Plus) treatment groups, respectively. With respect to all surfaces examined, the experimental toothbrush delivered an adjusted (via analysis of covariance) mean difference between baseline and post-brushing plaque scores of 0.87 while the control toothbrush delivered an adjusted mean difference of 0.62. The difference between brushes was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The experimental toothbrush removed, on average, 40.0% more plaque than the control toothbrush.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12512989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  3 in total

Review 1.  Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health.

Authors:  Munirah Yaacob; Helen V Worthington; Scott A Deacon; Chris Deery; A Damien Walmsley; Peter G Robinson; Anne-Marie Glenny
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-06-17

Review 2.  Safety and Design Aspects of Powered Toothbrush-A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Clarence Ng; James Kit Hon Tsoi; Edward C M Lo; And Jukka P Matinlinna
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-05

3.  The Application Method of Nanobubble Conveyor on the Effect of Preventive Oral Hygiene.

Authors:  Pei-Ju Lin
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.682

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.