BACKGROUND: Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is associated with chronic airway inflammation resulting in bronchiectasis. METHODS: The levels of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), carbon monoxide (eCO) and nasal NO (nNO) from bronchiectatic patients with PCD (n=14) were compared with those from patients with non-PCD bronchiectasis without (n=31) and with cystic fibrosis (CF) (n=20) and from normal subjects (n=37) to assess the clinical usefulness of these measurements in discriminating between PCD and other causes of bronchiectasis. RESULTS: Exhaled NO levels were lower in patients with PCD than in patients with non-PCD non-CF bronchiectasis or healthy subjects (median (range) 2.1 (1.3-3.5) ppb v 8.7 (4.5-26.0) ppb, p<0.001; 6.7 (2.6-11.9) ppb, p<0.001, respectively) but not lower than bronchiectatic patients with CF (3.0 (1.5-7.5) ppb, p>0.05). Nasal levels of nNO were significantly lower in PCD patients than in any other subjects (PCD: 54.5 (5.0-269) ppb, non-PCD bronchiectasis without CF: 680 (310-1000) ppb, non-PCD bronchiectasis with CF: 343 (30-997) ppb, control: 663 (322-1343) ppb). In contrast, eCO levels were higher in all patient groups than in control subjects (PCD: 4.5 (3.0-24.0) ppm, p<0.01, other bronchiectasis without CF: 5.0 (3.0-15.0) ppm, p<0.001; CF: 5.3 (2.0-23.0) ppm, p<0.001 v 3.0 (0.5-5.0) ppm). Low values in both eNO and nNO readings (<2.4 ppb and <187 ppb, respectively) identified PCD patients from other bronchiectatic patients with a specificity of 98% and a positive predictive value of 92%. CONCLUSION: The simultaneous measurement of eNO and nNO is a useful screening tool for PCD.
BACKGROUND:Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is associated with chronic airway inflammation resulting in bronchiectasis. METHODS: The levels of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), carbon monoxide (eCO) and nasal NO (nNO) from bronchiectatic patients with PCD (n=14) were compared with those from patients with non-PCD bronchiectasis without (n=31) and with cystic fibrosis (CF) (n=20) and from normal subjects (n=37) to assess the clinical usefulness of these measurements in discriminating between PCD and other causes of bronchiectasis. RESULTS: Exhaled NO levels were lower in patients with PCD than in patients with non-PCD non-CF bronchiectasis or healthy subjects (median (range) 2.1 (1.3-3.5) ppb v 8.7 (4.5-26.0) ppb, p<0.001; 6.7 (2.6-11.9) ppb, p<0.001, respectively) but not lower than bronchiectatic patients with CF (3.0 (1.5-7.5) ppb, p>0.05). Nasal levels of nNO were significantly lower in PCDpatients than in any other subjects (PCD: 54.5 (5.0-269) ppb, non-PCD bronchiectasis without CF: 680 (310-1000) ppb, non-PCD bronchiectasis with CF: 343 (30-997) ppb, control: 663 (322-1343) ppb). In contrast, eCO levels were higher in all patient groups than in control subjects (PCD: 4.5 (3.0-24.0) ppm, p<0.01, other bronchiectasis without CF: 5.0 (3.0-15.0) ppm, p<0.001; CF: 5.3 (2.0-23.0) ppm, p<0.001 v 3.0 (0.5-5.0) ppm). Low values in both eNO and nNO readings (<2.4 ppb and <187 ppb, respectively) identified PCDpatients from other bronchiectatic patients with a specificity of 98% and a positive predictive value of 92%. CONCLUSION: The simultaneous measurement of eNO and nNO is a useful screening tool for PCD.
Authors: S A Kharitonov; A U Wells; B J O'Connor; P J Cole; D M Hansell; R B Logan-Sinclair; P J Barnes Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Stavros Konstantinides; Annette Geibel; Gerhard Heusel; Fritz Heinrich; Wolfgang Kasper Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-10-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: V M D Struben; M H Wieringa; C J Mantingh; J C de Jongste; L Feenstra Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2006-05-19 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Raed A Dweik; Peter B Boggs; Serpil C Erzurum; Charles G Irvin; Margaret W Leigh; Jon O Lundberg; Anna-Carin Olin; Alan L Plummer; D Robin Taylor Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Franco Cavaliere; Carmen Volpe; Riccardo Gargaruti; Andrea Poscia; Michele Di Donato; Giovanni Grieco; Umberto Moscato Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2009-12-23 Impact factor: 3.317