PURPOSE: To investigate whether the shape of the appendix in transverse section may be considered an ultrasonographic (US) criterion to exclude or confirm acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The shapes of appendices of 100 control subjects, of 174 patients with clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis but without acute appendicitis, and of 108 patients with acute appendicitis were prospectively evaluated with US. Definite diagnoses in patients with clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis were established and confirmed either with surgery and histologic examination in 161 patients or with clinical follow-up in 121 patients. Statistical measures such as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were assessed for the appendiceal shape as a diagnostic US criterion for acute appendicitis. RESULTS: An at least partly round appendix indicated acute appendicitis with a sensitivity of 100%; specificity of 37%; positive and negative predictive values of 50% and 100%, respectively; and accuracy of 61%. In 67 of 174 patients with clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis but without acute appendicitis, the partly ovoid appendiceal shape aided in the exclusion of acute appendicitis, since it indicated a normal appendix with a probability of 86%. In 65 of 174 patients with clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis but without acute appendicitis, the ovoid shape over the entire appendiceal length excluded acute appendicitis with confidence. CONCLUSION: The shape of the appendix in transverse section is a useful US criterion, since an ovoid shape over the entire appendiceal length reliably rules out acute appendicitis. Copyright RSNA, 2002
PURPOSE: To investigate whether the shape of the appendix in transverse section may be considered an ultrasonographic (US) criterion to exclude or confirm acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The shapes of appendices of 100 control subjects, of 174 patients with clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis but without acute appendicitis, and of 108 patients with acute appendicitis were prospectively evaluated with US. Definite diagnoses in patients with clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis were established and confirmed either with surgery and histologic examination in 161 patients or with clinical follow-up in 121 patients. Statistical measures such as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were assessed for the appendiceal shape as a diagnostic US criterion for acute appendicitis. RESULTS: An at least partly round appendix indicated acute appendicitis with a sensitivity of 100%; specificity of 37%; positive and negative predictive values of 50% and 100%, respectively; and accuracy of 61%. In 67 of 174 patients with clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis but without acute appendicitis, the partly ovoid appendiceal shape aided in the exclusion of acute appendicitis, since it indicated a normal appendix with a probability of 86%. In 65 of 174 patients with clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis but without acute appendicitis, the ovoid shape over the entire appendiceal length excluded acute appendicitis with confidence. CONCLUSION: The shape of the appendix in transverse section is a useful US criterion, since an ovoid shape over the entire appendiceal length reliably rules out acute appendicitis. Copyright RSNA, 2002
Authors: Jennifer R Marin; Alyssa M Abo; Alexander C Arroyo; Stephanie J Doniger; Jason W Fischer; Rachel Rempell; Brandi Gary; James F Holmes; David O Kessler; Samuel H F Lam; Marla C Levine; Jason A Levy; Alice Murray; Lorraine Ng; Vicki E Noble; Daniela Ramirez-Schrempp; David C Riley; Turandot Saul; Vaishali Shah; Adam B Sivitz; Ee Tein Tay; David Teng; Lindsey Chaudoin; James W Tsung; Rebecca L Vieira; Yaffa M Vitberg; Resa E Lewiss Journal: Crit Ultrasound J Date: 2016-11-03
Authors: Marcos Roberto Gomes de Queiroz; Miguel José Francisco Neto; Antonio Rahal Junior; Victor Arantes Jabour; Guilherme Neves Lourenço Andrade; Paulo Savoia Dias da Silva; Rodrigo Gobbo Garcia; Marcelo Dos Santos Pereira; Marina Ramos Santos; Pedro Andrade Alencar Luna; Yoshino Tamaki Sameshima; Fabiana Gual; Marcelo Guimarães Dutra; Beatriz Placca Germino; Isabella Ferreira Alves Journal: Einstein (Sao Paulo) Date: 2022-07-04