Literature DB >> 12511433

Reporting diagnostic tests.

Sharon E Straus.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12511433      PMCID: PMC1124924          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7379.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  J G Lijmer; B W Mol; S Heisterkamp; G J Bonsel; M H Prins; J H van der Meulen; P M Bossuyt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Why we need large, simple studies of the clinical examination: the problem and a proposed solution. CARE-COAD1 group. Clinical Assessment of the Reliability of the Examination-Chronic Obstructive Airways Disease Group.

Authors:  F A McAlister; S E Straus; D L Sackett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-11-13       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  D G Altman; K F Schulz; D Moher; M Egger; F Davidoff; D Elbourne; P C Gøtzsche; T Lang
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.

Authors:  D Moher; A Jones; L Lepage
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist.

Authors:  P J Devereaux; Braden J Manns; William A Ghali; Hude Quan; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2002-08

6.  The assessment of diagnostic tests: a comparison of medical literature in 1982 and 1985.

Authors:  B Arroll; M T Schechter; S B Sheps
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good.

Authors:  M C Reid; M S Lachs; A R Feinstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  More informative abstracts: current status and evaluation.

Authors:  R B Haynes
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 9.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-04
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  STARD and CONSORT: time for reflection.

Authors:  Peter J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.236

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.