Literature DB >> 12508590

Transsaccadic memory for visual object detail.

Peter De Graef1, Karl Verfaillie.   

Abstract

When we move our eyes around in real-world scenes, we typically have several peripheral previews of an object before we direct our eyes straight at the object. Numerous studies on transsaccadic memory have investigated whether there is any evidence for the integration of peripheral object information acquired presaccadically with foveal object information acquired postsaccadically. We review this evidence to illustrate the currently dominant view that transsaccadic object memory is sparse and contains little visual object detail. However, based on some recent studies of the role of postsaccadic stimulus blanking in transsaccadic change detection, we hypothesize that transsaccadic object memory involves the automatic emergence of a visual analog: a high-capacity, non-selective, internal representation of visual object detail. This hypothesis is tested by examining cued detection of intrasaccadic changes in the in-depth orientation of objects in scenes. The data provide preliminary support for the presence of the visual analog, but also show that its functionality is strictly limited by attentional and temporal constraints on the process of reading out information from the visual analog.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12508590     DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(02)40050-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  5 in total

1.  Mobile computation: spatiotemporal integration of the properties of objects in motion.

Authors:  Patrick Cavanagh; Alex O Holcombe; Weilun Chou
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Visual memory capacity in transsaccadic integration.

Authors:  Steven L Prime; Lia Tsotsos; Gerald P Keith; J Douglas Crawford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perceptual grouping of object contours survives saccades.

Authors:  Maarten Demeyer; Peter De Graef; Karl Verfaillie; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Neocortical Rebound Depolarization Enhances Visual Perception.

Authors:  Kenta Funayama; Genki Minamisawa; Nobuyoshi Matsumoto; Hiroshi Ban; Allen W Chan; Norio Matsuki; Timothy H Murphy; Yuji Ikegaya
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  A bias in saccadic suppression of shape change.

Authors:  Carolin Hübner; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 1.886

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.