Literature DB >> 12508533

Empathy leads to fairness.

Karen M Page1, Martin A Nowak.   

Abstract

In the Ultimatum Game, two players are asked to split a prize. The first player, the proposer, makes an offer of how to split the prize. The second player, the responder, either accepts the offer, in which case the prize is split as agreed, or rejects it, in which case neither player receives anything. The rational strategy suggested by classical game theory is for the proposer to offer the smallest possible positive share and for the responder to accept. Humans do not play this way, however, and instead tend to offer 50% of the prize and to reject offers below 20%. Here we study the Ultimatum Game in an evolutionary context and show that empathy can lead to the evolution of fairness. Empathy means that individuals make offers which they themselves would be prepared to accept.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12508533     DOI: 10.1006/bulm.2002.0321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Math Biol        ISSN: 0092-8240            Impact factor:   1.758


  18 in total

1.  Partner choice creates fairness in humans.

Authors:  Stéphane Debove; Jean-Baptiste André; Nicolas Baumard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  You are excusable! Neural correlates of economic neediness on empathic concern and fairness perception.

Authors:  Ailian Wang; Lian Zhu; Dong Lyu; Danfeng Cai; Qingguo Ma; Jia Jin
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Fairness considerations when I know more than you do: developmental comparisons.

Authors:  Sandy Overgaauw; Berna Güroğlu; Eveline A Crone
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-19

4.  Individual differences in decision making: Drive and Reward Responsiveness affect strategic bargaining in economic games.

Authors:  Anouk Scheres; Alan G Sanfey
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 3.759

5.  Random allocation of pies promotes the evolution of fairness in the Ultimatum Game.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Wang; Xiaojie Chen; Long Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Evolution of fairness in the not quite ultimatum game.

Authors:  Genki Ichinose; Hiroki Sayama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Equal status in Ultimatum Games promotes rational sharing.

Authors:  Xiao Han; Shinan Cao; Jian-Zhang Bao; Wen-Xu Wang; Boyu Zhang; Zi-You Gao; Angel Sánchez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Empathy emerges spontaneously in the ultimatum game: small groups and networks.

Authors:  Jaime Iranzo; Luis M Floría; Yamir Moreno; Angel Sánchez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Adaptive role switching promotes fairness in networked ultimatum game.

Authors:  Te Wu; Feng Fu; Yanling Zhang; Long Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The Evolution of Generosity in the Ultimatum Game.

Authors:  Arend Hintze; Ralph Hertwig
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.