Literature DB >> 12508507

Clean indoor air: where, why, and how.

Rosemarie Henson1, Larry Medina, Steve St Clair, Doug Blanke, Larry Downs, Jerelyn Jordan.   

Abstract

Clean indoor air policies are an effective way to eliminate exposure to second hand smoke and reduce smoking among youth and adults; they are strongly recommended by the Surgeon General and the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. How these policies are put into effect and at what level of government can make a difference. Legislation that preempts local action prevents communities from enacting more stringent laws or tailoring laws to address community-specific issues. Preemptive state laws also can be a barrier to local enforcement because communities not involved in decision making may be less aware of laws, may have no enforcement mechanism, and thus may be less complaint. Preemption is clearly a tobacco industry strategy to take away local control, usually in exchange for a weak law offering little protection from second hand smoke. As communities across the country continue to pass stronger local ordinances, eliminating preemptive laws becomes more important. During 2002, Delaware became the first state to repeal clean air preemption. In Iowa, the attorney general's office has been involved in the determination of whether the state clean air law prevents communities from passing more stringent ordinances. And although Minnesota's pioneer Clean Indoor Air Act does not preempt local laws, the debate over preemption there has not ended but instead has taken new forms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12508507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  4 in total

1.  Perceptions of industry responsibility and tobacco control policy by US tobacco company executives in trial testimony.

Authors:  Michael Chaiton; Roberta Ferrence; Eric LeGresley
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Policy-driven tobacco control.

Authors:  John A Francis; Erin M Abramsohn; Hye-Youn Park
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Competing initiatives: a new tobacco industry strategy to oppose statewide clean indoor air ballot measures.

Authors:  Gregory J Tung; Yogi H Hendlin; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The impact of state preemption of local smoking restrictions on public health protections and changes in social norms.

Authors:  Paul D Mowery; Steve Babb; Robin Hobart; Cindy Tworek; Allison MacNeil
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2012-05-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.