Literature DB >> 12508402

A cost effectiveness analysis of calcium and vitamin D supplementation, etidronate, and alendronate in the prevention of vertebral fractures in women treated with glucocorticoids.

Lenore M Buckley1, Bruce E Hillner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relative costs and benefits of calcium and vitamin D supplements, cyclic etidronate, or alendronate in the prevention of vertebral fractures for women and with normal bone density and osteopenia who are about to initiate moderate dose glucocorticoid treatment.
METHODS: Using a decision analysis model, we evaluated the following patients: 4 hypothetical cohorts: 30-yr-old women with normal lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) (t score = 0), 50-yr-old women with borderline osteopenia (t score = -1), 60-yr-old women with moderate osteopenia (t score = -1.5), and 70-yr-old women with severe osteopenia (t score = -2) treated with a mean prednisone dose of 10 mg/day for one year. The main outcomes included the development of vertebral fractures 10 years after glucocorticoid treatment and at age 80 (life-time risk) and direct and indirect costs.
RESULTS: At 10 years, calcium and vitamin D supplements decreased fracture rates by 30-50% at a minimal cost (US$800 or less per vertebral fracture avoided) or at a cost saving compared to no treatment for women with osteopenia (t score -1 to -2). Etidronate and alendronate are most cost effective in women with borderline osteoporosis (t scores of -1.5 and -2) in the 10 year analysis. In the life-time analysis, calcium and vitamin D treatment yielded a cost savings compared to no treatment for all groups with osteopenia. Etidronate decreased fracture rates further in all groups at a cost of less than $2,000 per fracture prevented. Alendronate reduced the fracture risk further at cost of $3,000-7,000 per fracture avoided.
CONCLUSION: Calcium and vitamin D supplements and low cost bisphosphonate regimens such as cyclic etidronate decrease the life-time vertebral fracture risk at acceptable costs and should be considered when initiating glucocorticoid treatment for women who do not have osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12508402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  9 in total

1.  Does the funding source influence the results in economic evaluations? A case study in bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Rachael L Fleurence; D Eldon Spackman; Christopher Hollenbeak
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  A framework for the development of guidelines for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Authors:  S Lekamwasam; J D Adachi; D Agnusdei; J Bilezikian; S Boonen; F Borgström; C Cooper; A Diez Perez; R Eastell; L C Hofbauer; J A Kanis; B L Langdahl; O Lesnyak; R Lorenc; E McCloskey; O D Messina; N Napoli; B Obermayer-Pietsch; S H Ralston; P N Sambrook; S Silverman; M Sosa; J Stepan; G Suppan; D A Wahl; J E Compston
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Prevention and Treatment of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis in Adults: Consensus Recommendations From the Belgian Bone Club.

Authors:  Michaël R Laurent; Stefan Goemaere; Charlotte Verroken; Pierre Bergmann; Jean-Jacques Body; Olivier Bruyère; Etienne Cavalier; Serge Rozenberg; Bruno Lapauw; Evelien Gielen
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.055

4.  Cost-effectiveness of multifaceted evidence implementation programs for the prevention of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Authors:  T Beukelman; K G Saag; J R Curtis; M L Kilgore; M Pisu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis with active vitamin D3 analogues: a review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including organ transplantation studies.

Authors:  R N J de Nijs; J W G Jacobs; A Algra; W F Lems; J W J Bijlsma
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  The cost effectiveness of bisphosphonates for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis: a structured review of the literature.

Authors:  Rachael L Fleurence; Cynthia P Iglesias; Jeanene M Johnson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Glucocorticosteroid-induced spinal osteoporosis: scientific update on pathophysiology and treatment.

Authors:  Albrecht W Popp; Juerg Isenegger; Elizabeth M Buergi; Ulrich Buergi; Kurt Lippuner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Can calcium chemoprevention of adenoma recurrence substitute or serve as an adjunct for colonoscopic surveillance?

Authors:  Aasma Shaukat; Murtaza Parekh; Joseph Lipscomb; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 2.188

9.  Economic evaluation of a national vitamin D supplementation program among Iranian adolescents for the prevention of adulthood type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Narges Zandieh; Mohsen Rezaei Hemami; Ali Darvishi; Seyed Mohammad Hasheminejad; Zahra Abdollahi; Maryam Zarei; Ramin Heshmat
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2022-01-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.