BACKGROUND: Methamphetamine (METH) and amphetamine (AMP) concentrations in 200 plasma and 590 oral fluid specimens were used to evaluate METH pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics after oral administration of sustained-release METH. METHODS: Eight participants received four oral 10-mg S-(+)-METH hydrochloride sustained-release tablets within 7 days. Three weeks later, five participants received four oral 20-mg doses. Blood samples were collected for up to 24 h and oral fluid for up to 72 h after drug administration. RESULTS: After the first oral dose, initial plasma METH detection was within 0.25-2 h; c(max) was 14.5-33.8 micro g/L (10 mg) and 26.2-44.3 micro g/L (20 mg) within 2-12 h. In oral fluid, METH was detected as early as 0.08-2 h; c(max) was 24.7-312.2 micro g/L (10 mg) and 75.3-321.7 micro g/L (20 mg) and occurred at 2-12 h. The median oral fluid-plasma METH concentration ratio was 2.0 across 24 h and was highly variable. Neutral cotton swab collection yielded significantly higher METH and AMP concentrations than citric acid candy-stimulated expectoration. Mean (SD) areas under the curve for AMP were 21% +/- 25% and 24% +/- 11% of those observed for METH in plasma and oral fluid, respectively. After a single low or high dose, plasma METH was >2.5 micro g/L for up to 24 h in 9 of 12 individuals (mean, 7.3 +/- 5.5 micro g/L at 24 h); in oral fluid the detection window was at least 24 h (mean, 18.8 +/- 18.0 micro g/L at 24 h). The plasma and oral fluid 24-h METH detection rates were 54% and 60%, respectively. After four administrations, METH was measurable for 36-72 h (mean, 58.3 +/- 14.5 h). CONCLUSIONS: Perceived advantages of oral fluid for verifying METH exposure compared with urine include simpler specimen collection and reduced potential for adulteration, but urine offers higher analyte concentrations and a greater window of detection.
BACKGROUND:Methamphetamine (METH) and amphetamine (AMP) concentrations in 200 plasma and 590 oral fluid specimens were used to evaluate METH pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics after oral administration of sustained-release METH. METHODS: Eight participants received four oral 10-mg S-(+)-METH hydrochloride sustained-release tablets within 7 days. Three weeks later, five participants received four oral 20-mg doses. Blood samples were collected for up to 24 h and oral fluid for up to 72 h after drug administration. RESULTS: After the first oral dose, initial plasma METH detection was within 0.25-2 h; c(max) was 14.5-33.8 micro g/L (10 mg) and 26.2-44.3 micro g/L (20 mg) within 2-12 h. In oral fluid, METH was detected as early as 0.08-2 h; c(max) was 24.7-312.2 micro g/L (10 mg) and 75.3-321.7 micro g/L (20 mg) and occurred at 2-12 h. The median oral fluid-plasma METH concentration ratio was 2.0 across 24 h and was highly variable. Neutral cotton swab collection yielded significantly higher METH and AMP concentrations than citric acid candy-stimulated expectoration. Mean (SD) areas under the curve for AMP were 21% +/- 25% and 24% +/- 11% of those observed for METH in plasma and oral fluid, respectively. After a single low or high dose, plasma METH was >2.5 micro g/L for up to 24 h in 9 of 12 individuals (mean, 7.3 +/- 5.5 micro g/L at 24 h); in oral fluid the detection window was at least 24 h (mean, 18.8 +/- 18.0 micro g/L at 24 h). The plasma and oral fluid 24-h METH detection rates were 54% and 60%, respectively. After four administrations, METH was measurable for 36-72 h (mean, 58.3 +/- 14.5 h). CONCLUSIONS: Perceived advantages of oral fluid for verifying METH exposure compared with urine include simpler specimen collection and reduced potential for adulteration, but urine offers higher analyte concentrations and a greater window of detection.
Authors: Jessica L Reynolds; Wing Cheung Law; Supriya D Mahajan; Ravikumar Aalinkeel; Bindukumar Nair; Donald E Sykes; Ken-Tye Yong; Rui Hui; Paras N Prasad; Stanley A Schwartz Journal: J Neuroimmune Pharmacol Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Michael L Smith; Shawn P Vorce; Justin M Holler; Eric Shimomura; Joe Magluilo; Aaron J Jacobs; Marilyn A Huestis Journal: J Anal Toxicol Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Brenda A Miller; Debra Furr-Holden; Mark B Johnson; Harold Holder; Robert Voas; Carolyn Keagy Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Madhavan P N Nair; Zainulabedin M Saiyed; Narayanan Nair; Nimisha H Gandhi; Jose W Rodriguez; Nawal Boukli; Elias Provencio-Vasquez; Robert M Malow; Maria Jose Miguez-Burbano Journal: J Neuroimmune Pharmacol Date: 2008-10-29 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Allan J Barnes; Michael L Smith; Sherri L Kacinko; Eugene W Schwilke; Edward J Cone; Eric T Moolchan; Marilyn A Huestis Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2007-11-02 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Hallvard Gjerde; Asbjørg S Christophersen; Inger S Moan; Borghild Yttredal; J Michael Walsh; Per T Normann; Jørg Mørland Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 2.646