OBJECTIVES: Thymidine phosphorylase (TdR-Pase) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) are thought to be key enzymes in the metabolic pathway of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Theoretically, cancer cells which have high TdR-Pase activity and/or low DPD activity should be sensitive to 5-FU. TdR-Pase is also known to have angiogenic activity which helps tumor progression and metastasis. On the other hand, little is known concerning the relationship of DPD activity with clinical malignant potential in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In this study, we measured both TdR-Pase and DPD activities in surgically obtained RCC tissues and examined the relationship between these enzymatic activities and histological parameters. In addition, the results of in vitro chemosensitivity testing were also analyzed to determine whether TdR-Pase and/or DPD activity in carcinoma cells can predict the efficacy of 5-FU. METHODS: RCC tissues from 53 patients were obtained. TdR-Pase and DPD activities were measured by ELISA and radioenzyme assay, respectively. Sensitivity to 5-FU was assessed by histoculture drug response assay (HDRA), an in vitro chemosensitivity test, for 20 of the 53 specimens. RESULTS: Both TdR-Pase and DPD activities of RCC increased with histological grade. There was a significant positive correlation between the TdR-Pase activity and 5-FU sensitivity. In addition, a stronger positive correlation was found between TdR-Pase / DPD ratio and 5-FU sensitivity. DPD exhibited no correlation with 5-FU sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The activity of both enzymes increased with malignant potential of RCC. TdR-Pase appeared to be the enzyme regulating activation of 5-FU in RCC.
OBJECTIVES: Thymidine phosphorylase (TdR-Pase) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) are thought to be key enzymes in the metabolic pathway of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Theoretically, cancer cells which have high TdR-Pase activity and/or low DPD activity should be sensitive to 5-FU. TdR-Pase is also known to have angiogenic activity which helps tumor progression and metastasis. On the other hand, little is known concerning the relationship of DPD activity with clinical malignant potential in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In this study, we measured both TdR-Pase and DPD activities in surgically obtained RCC tissues and examined the relationship between these enzymatic activities and histological parameters. In addition, the results of in vitro chemosensitivity testing were also analyzed to determine whether TdR-Pase and/or DPD activity in carcinoma cells can predict the efficacy of 5-FU. METHODS:RCC tissues from 53 patients were obtained. TdR-Pase and DPD activities were measured by ELISA and radioenzyme assay, respectively. Sensitivity to 5-FU was assessed by histoculture drug response assay (HDRA), an in vitro chemosensitivity test, for 20 of the 53 specimens. RESULTS: Both TdR-Pase and DPD activities of RCC increased with histological grade. There was a significant positive correlation between the TdR-Pase activity and 5-FU sensitivity. In addition, a stronger positive correlation was found between TdR-Pase / DPD ratio and 5-FU sensitivity. DPD exhibited no correlation with 5-FU sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The activity of both enzymes increased with malignant potential of RCC. TdR-Pase appeared to be the enzyme regulating activation of 5-FU in RCC.
Authors: J Scott Brockenbrough; Janice K Morihara; Stephen E Hawes; Joshua E Stern; Janet S Rasey; Linda W Wiens; Qinghua Feng; Hubert Vesselle Journal: J Histochem Cytochem Date: 2009-08-03 Impact factor: 2.479