Literature DB >> 12507446

On bias in the estimation of autocorrelations for fMRI voxel time-series analysis.

Jonathan L Marchini1, Stephen M Smith.   

Abstract

For fMRI time-series analysis to be statistically valid, it is important to deal correctly with temporal autocorrelation in the noise. Most of the approaches in the literature adopt a two-stage approach in which the autocorrelation structure is estimated using the residuals of an initial model fit. This estimate is then used to "prewhiten" the data and the model before the model is refit to obtain final activation parameter estimates. An assumption implicit in this scheme is that the residuals from the initial model fit represent a realization of the "true" noise process. In general this assumption will not be correct as certain components of the noise will be removed by the model fit. In this paper we examine (i) the form of the bias induced by the initial model fit, (ii) methods of correcting for the bias, and (iii) the impact of bias correction on the model parameter estimates. We find that while bias correction does result in more accurate estimates of the correlation structure, this does not translate into improved estimates of the model parameters. In fact estimates of the model parameters and their standard errors are seen to be so accurate that we conclude that bias correction is unnecessary.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12507446     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  11 in total

1.  Detection and quantification of a wide range of fMRI temporal responses using a physiologically-motivated basis set.

Authors:  Michael P Harms; Jennifer R Melcher
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Determining hierarchical functional networks from auditory stimuli fMRI.

Authors:  Rajan S Patel; F Dubois Bowman; James K Rilling
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Event-related functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) based on craniocerebral correlations: reproducibility of activation?

Authors:  M M Plichta; M J Herrmann; C G Baehne; A-C Ehlis; M M Richter; P Pauli; A J Fallgatter
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Power calculation for group fMRI studies accounting for arbitrary design and temporal autocorrelation.

Authors:  Jeanette A Mumford; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-08-19       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Anticipatory alpha oscillation predicts attentional selection and hemodynamic response.

Authors:  Chenguang Zhao; Jialiang Guo; Dongwei Li; Ye Tao; Yulong Ding; Hanli Liu; Yan Song
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  FMRI group analysis combining effect estimates and their variances.

Authors:  Gang Chen; Ziad S Saad; Audrey R Nath; Michael S Beauchamp; Robert W Cox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  A Bayesian approach to determining connectivity of the human brain.

Authors:  Rajan S Patel; F Dubois Bowman; James K Rilling
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Robust and unbiased variance of GLM coefficients for misspecified autocorrelation and hemodynamic response models in fMRI.

Authors:  Lourens Waldorp
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2009-09-06

9.  Potential pitfalls when denoising resting state fMRI data using nuisance regression.

Authors:  Molly G Bright; Christopher R Tench; Kevin Murphy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Development of the complex general linear model in the Fourier domain: application to fMRI multiple input-output evoked responses for single subjects.

Authors:  Daniel E Rio; Robert R Rawlings; Lawrence A Woltz; Jodi Gilman; Daniel W Hommer
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.