Literature DB >> 12507131

Preoperative magnetic source imaging for brain tumor surgery: a quantitative comparison with intraoperative sensory and motor mapping.

Hagen Schiffbauer1, Mitchel S Berger, Paul Ferrari, Dirk Freudenstein, Howard A Rowley, Timothy P L Roberts.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The aim of this study was to compare quantitatively the methods of preoperative magnetic source (MS) imaging and intraoperative electrophysiological cortical mapping (ECM) in the localization of sensorimotor cortex in patients with intraaxial brain tumors.
METHODS: Preoperative magnetoencephalography (MEG) was performed while patients received painless tactile somatosensory stimulation of the lip, hand, and foot. The early somatosensory evoked field was modeled using a single equivalent current dipole approach to estimate the spatial source of the response. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance image volume data sets with fiducials were coregistered with the MEG recordings to form the MS image. These individualized functional brain maps were integrated into a neuronavigation system. Intraoperative mapping of somatosensory and/or motor cortex was performed and sites were compared. In two subgroups of patients we compared intraoperative somatosensory and motor stimulation sites with MS imaging-based somatosensory localizations. Mediolateral projection of the MS imaging source localizations to the cortical surface reduced systematic intermodality discrepancies. The distance between two corresponding points determined using MS imaging and ECM was 12.5 +/- 1.3 mm for somatosensory-somatosensory and 19 +/- 1.3 mm for somatosensory-motor comparisons. The observed 6.5 mm increase in site separation was systematically demonstrated in the anteroposterior direction, as expected from actual anatomy. In fact, intraoperative sites at which stimulation evoked the same patient response exhibited a spatial variation of 10.7 +/- 0.7 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative MS imaging and intraoperative ECM show a favorable degree of quantitative correlation. Thus, MS imaging can be considered a valuable and accurate planning adjunct in the treatment of patients with intraaxial brain tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12507131     DOI: 10.3171/jns.2002.97.6.1333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  20 in total

1.  Motor field sensitivity for preoperative localization of motor cortex.

Authors:  Peter T Lin; Mitchel S Berger; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Accuracy analysis of fMRI and MEG activations determined by intraoperative mapping.

Authors:  David G Ellis; Matthew L White; Satoru Hayasaka; David E Warren; Tony W Wilson; Michele R Aizenberg
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Awake surgery in low-grade gliomas harboring eloquent areas: 3-year mean follow-up.

Authors:  S Sarubbo; F Latini; A Panajia; C Candela; R Quatrale; P Milani; E Fainardi; E Granieri; G Trapella; V Tugnoli; M A Cavallo
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Comparison of functional MR imaging guidance to electrical cortical mapping for targeting selective motor cortex areas in neuropathic pain: a study based on intraoperative stereotactic navigation.

Authors:  Benoit Pirotte; Carine Neugroschl; Thierry Metens; David Wikler; Vincent Denolin; Philippe Voordecker; Alfred Joffroy; Nicolas Massager; Jacques Brotchi; Marc Levivier; Danielle Baleriaux
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Preoperative multimodal motor mapping: a comparison of magnetoencephalography imaging, navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation, and direct cortical stimulation.

Authors:  Phiroz E Tarapore; Matthew C Tate; Anne M Findlay; Susanne M Honma; Danielle Mizuiri; Mitchel S Berger; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 6.  New concepts in surgery of WHO grade II gliomas: functional brain mapping, connectionism and plasticity--a review.

Authors:  Hugues Duffau
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Erin Simon Schwartz; J Christopher Edgar; William C Gaetz; Timothy P L Roberts
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-11-24

8.  Comparison of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative mapping in rolandic tumor surgery.

Authors:  Jan Coburger; Christian Musahl; Hans Henkes; Diana Horvath-Rizea; Markus Bittl; Claudia Weissbach; Nikolai Hopf
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 9.  Electrophysiological signatures: magnetoencephalographic studies of the neural correlates of language impairment in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Timothy P L Roberts; Gwen L Schmidt; Marc Egeth; Lisa Blaskey; Michael M Rey; J Christopher Edgar; Susan E Levy
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 2.997

10.  Volumetric assessment of tumor infiltration of adjacent white matter based on anatomic MRI and diffusion tensor tractography.

Authors:  Ion-Florin Talos; Kelly H Zou; Ron Kikinis; Ferenc A Jolesz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.