OBJECT: The aim of this study was to compare quantitatively the methods of preoperative magnetic source (MS) imaging and intraoperative electrophysiological cortical mapping (ECM) in the localization of sensorimotor cortex in patients with intraaxial brain tumors. METHODS: Preoperative magnetoencephalography (MEG) was performed while patients received painless tactile somatosensory stimulation of the lip, hand, and foot. The early somatosensory evoked field was modeled using a single equivalent current dipole approach to estimate the spatial source of the response. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance image volume data sets with fiducials were coregistered with the MEG recordings to form the MS image. These individualized functional brain maps were integrated into a neuronavigation system. Intraoperative mapping of somatosensory and/or motor cortex was performed and sites were compared. In two subgroups of patients we compared intraoperative somatosensory and motor stimulation sites with MS imaging-based somatosensory localizations. Mediolateral projection of the MS imaging source localizations to the cortical surface reduced systematic intermodality discrepancies. The distance between two corresponding points determined using MS imaging and ECM was 12.5 +/- 1.3 mm for somatosensory-somatosensory and 19 +/- 1.3 mm for somatosensory-motor comparisons. The observed 6.5 mm increase in site separation was systematically demonstrated in the anteroposterior direction, as expected from actual anatomy. In fact, intraoperative sites at which stimulation evoked the same patient response exhibited a spatial variation of 10.7 +/- 0.7 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative MS imaging and intraoperative ECM show a favorable degree of quantitative correlation. Thus, MS imaging can be considered a valuable and accurate planning adjunct in the treatment of patients with intraaxial brain tumors.
OBJECT: The aim of this study was to compare quantitatively the methods of preoperative magnetic source (MS) imaging and intraoperative electrophysiological cortical mapping (ECM) in the localization of sensorimotor cortex in patients with intraaxial brain tumors. METHODS: Preoperative magnetoencephalography (MEG) was performed while patients received painless tactile somatosensory stimulation of the lip, hand, and foot. The early somatosensory evoked field was modeled using a single equivalent current dipole approach to estimate the spatial source of the response. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance image volume data sets with fiducials were coregistered with the MEG recordings to form the MS image. These individualized functional brain maps were integrated into a neuronavigation system. Intraoperative mapping of somatosensory and/or motor cortex was performed and sites were compared. In two subgroups of patients we compared intraoperative somatosensory and motor stimulation sites with MS imaging-based somatosensory localizations. Mediolateral projection of the MS imaging source localizations to the cortical surface reduced systematic intermodality discrepancies. The distance between two corresponding points determined using MS imaging and ECM was 12.5 +/- 1.3 mm for somatosensory-somatosensory and 19 +/- 1.3 mm for somatosensory-motor comparisons. The observed 6.5 mm increase in site separation was systematically demonstrated in the anteroposterior direction, as expected from actual anatomy. In fact, intraoperative sites at which stimulation evoked the same patient response exhibited a spatial variation of 10.7 +/- 0.7 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative MS imaging and intraoperative ECM show a favorable degree of quantitative correlation. Thus, MS imaging can be considered a valuable and accurate planning adjunct in the treatment of patients with intraaxial brain tumors.
Authors: David G Ellis; Matthew L White; Satoru Hayasaka; David E Warren; Tony W Wilson; Michele R Aizenberg Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: S Sarubbo; F Latini; A Panajia; C Candela; R Quatrale; P Milani; E Fainardi; E Granieri; G Trapella; V Tugnoli; M A Cavallo Journal: Neurol Sci Date: 2011-04-13 Impact factor: 3.307
Authors: Benoit Pirotte; Carine Neugroschl; Thierry Metens; David Wikler; Vincent Denolin; Philippe Voordecker; Alfred Joffroy; Nicolas Massager; Jacques Brotchi; Marc Levivier; Danielle Baleriaux Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Phiroz E Tarapore; Matthew C Tate; Anne M Findlay; Susanne M Honma; Danielle Mizuiri; Mitchel S Berger; Srikantan S Nagarajan Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Jan Coburger; Christian Musahl; Hans Henkes; Diana Horvath-Rizea; Markus Bittl; Claudia Weissbach; Nikolai Hopf Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2012-08-11 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Timothy P L Roberts; Gwen L Schmidt; Marc Egeth; Lisa Blaskey; Michael M Rey; J Christopher Edgar; Susan E Levy Journal: Int J Psychophysiol Date: 2008-02-12 Impact factor: 2.997